GunMonkeys Posted March 21, 2009 Report Share Posted March 21, 2009 http://weaponblender.com/index.php?productID=1088 I saw this today. Maybe they just put a kit on a dragunov or an ak47. Still pretty cool though. Link to post Share on other sites
kken Posted March 21, 2009 Report Share Posted March 21, 2009 that has been out for awhile and it's just an ak fruitcaked up a bit to be an "rpk"... Link to post Share on other sites
Ferrarilove1 Posted March 21, 2009 Report Share Posted March 21, 2009 That's news to me, and a quote from the site, "Full wood stock/grips. The rest is metal except for the lower reciever (barrel, upper, sights, trigger, etc)." Full wood stock/grips. The rest is metal except for......... everything!!!!! Link to post Share on other sites
Alakdan101 Posted March 22, 2009 Report Share Posted March 22, 2009 posted here last 2007... http://blogs.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseact...5857D9443213621 posted here also last year.... http://www.arniesairsoft.co.uk/forums/inde...p;#entry1735813 http://www.red-alliance.net/forum/index.php?topic=8919.0 Link to post Share on other sites
TheProfessional Posted March 22, 2009 Report Share Posted March 22, 2009 Kind of an ugly looking gun if you ask me... i agree with kken, looks like a someone took an ak and did unspeakable things to it. Link to post Share on other sites
michaelmike Posted March 22, 2009 Report Share Posted March 22, 2009 HI! Maybe,just maybe we should all united and refused to buy from any lazy manufacturer who either don't do any research or just plain thought we airsofters are stupid. They should get the message. Link to post Share on other sites
Frontiers Posted March 22, 2009 Report Share Posted March 22, 2009 HI! Maybe,just maybe we should all united and refused to buy from any lazy manufacturer who either don't do any research or just plain thought we airsofters are stupid. They should get the message. like JG's Sig-550 is made from same parts as Sig-552 navy talk about lazy ones haha Link to post Share on other sites
kken Posted March 22, 2009 Report Share Posted March 22, 2009 naw, airsofters are too cheap to not buy junk from junk manufacturers the "rpk" is not bad for the money, just don't say "it's pretty cool" or legit. just know you get what you pay for and don't act any different. Link to post Share on other sites
Alakdan101 Posted March 22, 2009 Report Share Posted March 22, 2009 Kind of an ugly looking gun if you ask me... i agree with kken, looks like a someone took an ak and did unspeakable things to it. RPK is a badass of all AK Variants... JG can be modified to look more near the look of RS instead creating from zero. Otherwise, buy expensive ino/guarder or LCT. The only thing I notice from JG RPK and maybe better from the other brand is the one piece outer barrel. I hate to disassemble my Guarder RPK-74...take out 1st the front sight, the extension outer barrel, the HG and the trunnion before I can take out my GB. If JG RPK out, I take two of it for my RPK-47 projects... And I assumed, it's a TM clone. like JG's Sig-550 is made from same parts as Sig-552 navy talk about lazy ones hahaJust asking, except the 3-burst fire, can you ID which one is wrong? Link to post Share on other sites
Frontiers Posted March 22, 2009 Report Share Posted March 22, 2009 Just asking, except the 3-burst fire, can you ID which one is wrong? i forget the exact part names, but im sure you can find it if you read the reviews, it uses same parts as the navy version (they didnt bother to make new parts just took the low road and put the same parts as the other version even its not the same in the real copy ) Link to post Share on other sites
Frontiers Posted March 22, 2009 Report Share Posted March 22, 2009 Just asking, except the 3-burst fire, can you ID which one is wrong? i forget the exact part names, but im sure you can find it if you read the reviews, it uses same parts as the navy version (they didnt bother to make new parts just took the low road and put the same parts as the other version even its not the same in the real copy ) Link to post Share on other sites
GunMonkeys Posted March 22, 2009 Author Report Share Posted March 22, 2009 that has been out for awhile and it's just an ak fruitcaked up a bit to be an "rpk"... Where? I've never seen it before. the "rpk" is not bad for the money, just don't say "it's pretty cool" or legit. just know you get what you pay for and don't act any different. It still looks like an RPK just not completely accurate. What parts are inaccurate, the receiver or the whole thing? Link to post Share on other sites
Alakdan101 Posted March 22, 2009 Report Share Posted March 22, 2009 @GunMonkeys: AFAIK, shirleytoys wants it to dispose for 50 items per order. [edit] correction: 60pcs min order @Frontiers: Nothing wrong with that, I got a TMSIG552 which is the same as JG except they includes top rails. I got iCSSIG551, almost same receiver design except of course the takedown and functional parts. In RS, what I know, 3 burst is optional and I can live without it. To conclude, nothing wrong if JG took the AK for RPK base gun. The question is, the availability because I want it now. Link to post Share on other sites
superfelix Posted March 24, 2009 Report Share Posted March 24, 2009 The wooden parts seem to be in fruitcage quality so an RPK with ugly wooden parts is not nice ( i used to own an INOKATSU RPK with RS laminated wood ) Better then take AK + InOKATSU RPK kit for Marui + Rs woods Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.