otherrandomhero

|_ <> |_ \\\\\/////////||||||||____ /\ /\/\ -|- 3 |-| \/\/ | |\| Yeah, I saw it too. Not there anymore, though.

So...you're saying we need to bomb the iternet? Darklite, ready the attack!

Hip hip, horray! hip hip, eh you get the point... Anyways, the new server rocks out with its socks out. No more of the forums crashing at the exact moment I go on to find someone's address to ship out a part.

Won't work, I believe these are actually humans posting these. The MAA forum has one of the text-in-an-image things, I believe, and we got a spambot for penis enlargement just the other day.

Yeah...sorry about that. My sunday school class gets a bit out of hand sometimes.

Awesome review, +1 fo' joo!

Ah, nothing beats the unmistakeable smell of victory.

I really find this quite humorous, all of it. Before continuing I'll say: what the hell are you trying to prove, that a gun kit which costs several times more that a gun intended to be an affordable replica is better? No sh*t sherlock. Outlandish? O RLY? What have I said that's outlandish? Of course there are other kits that are higher quality, they just happen to cost several times more and don't come with a gearbox. What the hell is your point? No sh*t TM never made an RPK. Note the use of "would be." Plus, who said that my friend (who I assume you're talking abou

I added $100 because the guarder kit doesn't come with a metal reciever. The only one that does is the all steel kit, which hasn't been made in a long time and costs nearly $1000 new. Ikonatsu kits are even higher. It doesn't matter one bit what your USED one came with, the standard kit doesn't have one. Why buy used when you can get new, anyways? Plus, buying an upgraded used gun is a horrible idea, since you have no idea who installed them, if the parts were installed correctly, all that stuff. Regardless, upgraded+used=bad idea. The SRC replicated the reciever or a Marui correctly, fro

Well, it had damn well better be a lot better quality. The guarder kit is: -$225 for TM AK -$475 for guarder kit -$35 for hicap -$100 for metal body and support parts -$50 for a nice tightbore That totals $900 with shipping. This is 3 times what the SRC costs. If it wasn't much better quality, no one would even think about buying it. Anyways, the new piston head, nozzle, firefly bucking, and tightbore were installed today. This totally made the gun rock! It shoots about 10% over the forum limir now, is very accurate, and fires around 1100 RPM on the 10.8v battery we have

Thanks! If you buy one for game purposes (not just wallhanging), pick up at least a 9.6v battery and most likely some power upgrades too. Performance was mediocre before, but that 40 or so FPS and ROF upgrade really kicked it into gear. I want one now . I'd also like to see what a tightbore barrel does to it. It most definitely has potential to be a kick-*albatross* support or sniper weapon, but you'll need to put a bit of work into it. Otherwise, it's just a ridiculously massive mediocre assault rifle. Psycho: Yes, yes, yes times a million. The entire weight of the gun is in front of you

Well, he got fed up with the lack of performance and decided to up the power. We opened up the gearbox about a week ago and checked everything out. It looks very similar to my XM8, read up on the review here of said XM8 with pictures for detailed info on that. We put a 1J spring in there and did some regular lubing. Immediately the gun chrono'ed at around 320, but it has since broken in and shoots in the 300-310 range. I'm guessing the gun has some compression issues in it, so a new piston head and possibly air nozzle will be in order. I'll keep you guys updated on it.

PC usage: Sledge raped me last night, and now I'm afraid to go to sleep. Internet usage: Sledge totally post-raped me, and now I'm afraid to go to sleep. Arnies usage: Sledge's gun has been totally raped to the point where it's hideousness makes me afraid to go to sleep.

He brings up a good point. Is there rape in the animal kingdom excluding humans? I'd really like to know. OP: rape on arnies=fugly add-ons/body kits/ other mods to make a gun very unappealing to the eye. Don't take it too hard. rape on arnies =/= forced sexual acts.

I ran a chrono a bit ago right after a fresh coat of lube and a good cleaning of the tightbore. Before the barrel was put in, it ran about 310-320. The sights are just about completely useless with your cheek bone on, and with the jawbone you can almost see them well enough for regular use. Realistically, without a sight of some sort the sights aren't really practical for skirmish use.

In short: don't modify the gun. Strangely enough, I could get the hopup out with just a fair bit of force to replace the barrel. If you readers are looking for a performance and such review, I wrote a mini-one a bit lower down the page.

I covered this a little bit in mine. Maximum range will be 150-160 feet with no wind at all in perfect conditions with hop set at the exact right place. In a regular skirmish expect about 140 max then, since conditions probably won't be perfect. All's i have to compare it to accuracy-wise is my SG1, which it is (obviously) less accurate than.

Agreed ^^^^^^^^^ I gave it a 10 in my review, as I really can't think of anything SRC could have done to make this better considering its low price tag.

I'd like to switch over to random_hero, just because mine now is a little long and cumbersome.

Okay, but use smileys if you are joking. When you don't things like this happen. Retaliatory rep reported. Read the rules before posting.

You, sir, are a disrespectful idiot who clearly knows nothing about teh intranets. This is a site error that just happens sometimes. I know it's happened to me once or twice, and i'm not A N00B HITTING RANDOM BUTTONS; i probably wouldnt have gotten this far on the forums without getting banned if I had been. Bengali, don't sweat it, it just happens sometimes. It probably has some relation to the recent screw-uppy-ness of the forums lately.

The FAMAS is the epitome of creakiness. It would take a lot to be creakier than that. The XM8 is hardly creaky, but it is just enough to be worth mentioning. The stock is a tiny bit loose and seems to creak a bit. By front end flex he means the entire front end. The entire gun is pretty much a plastic shell around a gearbox and shell, as opposed to something like an M4 where there are smaller sections the gun is built out of. The front end of the gun, just as he says, flexes a little bit, as simple as that. A lot of people don't know this from the pictures, but this is a big gun. By big, i mea

Can we just end this stupid discussion? We're already out of forum limits on what we can discuss, and this is hardly even worth discussing anyways. Sale: regardless, you can't argue that a metal bb will be softer than a plastic one. Because of this, even if they do shatter, the very slight amount of flex a bb has will be greater on the plastic one because it's softer. That was my point before, and thats my point now. If something is softer, it will hurt less. Boom, done, end of story.

Fantastic guide, now I can finally get mine apart! I'd like a second opinion from another owner though: do you think the front will be able to support the weight of a grenade launcher? I was thinking of picking up an AG36 or HK69 and putting it on mine, it would be teh ubAr-sEcHs.

Density means absolutely nothing, since they are all .3g and 6mm. Regardless, they have the same relative density. What makes a difference is the hardness of the substance. Most high-quality bbs are designed to flex when they hit something (they do this to prevent shattering, but flexing instead). Metal, on the other hand, is a much stronger substance than plastic is and therefore doesn't flex nearly as easily. As a result of this, when it hits something more energy is transferred into the target, as opposed to a plastic bb in which less energy is transferred since flexing keeps it from transf