Jump to content


Regular Poster
  • Content Count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by MCXL

  1. Holy smokes, that thing holds a lot more gas.
  2. Looking forward to more info about the replacement bolt. I want a skirmishable gun and would prefer it to be the 416c (but if it ain't gonna happen than WE G36 it is.)
  3. No updates on this in awhille eh? Really curious about the new 416c model.
  4. came from the future to conquer the past.

  5. Have you tried a mag well conversion on this? or any of the old G36 body style accessories? I would love to know what fits and what doesn't.
  6. C strike man what the hell is going on with that UBR?
  7. +1 The paint pen is for things that can unscrew. The rear take down pin and the body pins don't need it. The non spin pins that are tied together have screws to clamp them to the bar, which is why you see the paint on some guns, but for standard pin retention, you don't need the paint.
  8. Get rid of those stickers on the mags man.
  9. MCXL

    M14 Picture Thread

    I am looking for info on the G&P EBR series of guns, and EBR's in general. I have a thread HERE for any 'experts' who want to help me out.
  10. A new low for posts in this thread catfishsalesco.
  11. Wow L4byr1nth, that post was downright hateful. For someone who talks about "R-E-S-P-E-C-T" you sure don't show any. Obviously you missed all the stuff about the "Its better then most places" being a ###### poor argument for the practices and mistakes of the moderating team here. Even if in your mind armies is number one in online moderation technique, there is always room for improvement. You also manage to miss ENTIRELY what we are talking about here. This isn't about the RS discussion thread being closed, it's about the actions of one moderator that ultimately ended in the thread
  12. I cant muster the strength to respond, but I think there are 2 2week suspensions that prove your statement wrong. Maybe I'm misreading what your saying? Anyhow, I am out for now. SO tired.
  13. His point is valid nonetheless. I'm to tired to sustain the level of outrage that I need to make my long winded posts right now.
  14. No I am not advocating a abolition of the warn, Im just saying it isn't a total record, and using it as such is a little silly.
  15. I simply mean that the best record of out past conduct isn't some warn list its our previous posts.
  16. "Thats right Mr. Its going on your permanent record!" Am I wrong in think that aside from posts that get deleted the record of our conduct is in the forum history archive whatever you want to call it?
  17. Think what you like but beliefs in one area don't dictate your political spectrum. You can be pro choice and a Republican, or Pro life and a democrat. Part of a persons political beliefs don't dictate the rest. Just because he like guns doesn't mean that is enough to vote on. For instance I to am pro gun, but I also voted for President Obama, and on almost every social and fiscal issue between the 2 major parties here in the US I side with the democrats. I don't think they are perfect, but I don't like where the republican party has gone over the last 20 years. I don't want this thread to
  18. So your first approach was wrong then? Thats what your saying? It didn't work and obviously people aren't happy about it. EDIT: fixed to say what I meant.
  19. Well enough warn points ends in a ban, so while your right, he is also right. I simply didnt want to mangle his quote with that correction, but I do concede, skirting the swear filter doesnt end in an instant ban. Now then. The issue here is your a moderator, A MODERATOR. You are held to a higher standard of conduct, so while a forum user might get away with not skirting the swear filter and calling someone an idiot, you don't get that same privilege, let alone the ability to skirt the swear filter and then maliciously suspend people. EDIT: Oh and just to be clear, Titleist isn't a r
  20. So what your saying is that because they are in power they should be in power... Yea monarchy for the win I guess. Of course in this case I am not questioning the whole staff, simply the system in place for oversight (there is none) and the actions of one moderator. EDIT: this is to SAMM of course.
  21. It got personal when he started insulting and swearing via PM, that was awhille back, as in in pre this thread. I want to make it very clear, my arguements are of sound mind and logic, even if I am incredibly angry. And SAMM I have to say that your comments so far have been of a low value "To have taken regular members' opinions as gospel as to how the forum is run isn't very fair, and hints towards an 'Us versus Them' attitude. No one is defending anyone, no one is saying "shut up or leave" - simply get used to it, because the rest of us have and that's why we're still here!" You co
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and the use of session cookies.