kullwarrior

It works pretty well for 8C

How's the DH mod working in terms of fps stability? I've heard rumour suggesting that the fps deviation increases. PS BioRage, I don't know you but reading on this thread I felt you're a bit overly aggressive with touting GHK as best gbbr. Bada Bing's did a pretty good job on being objective. I'll be honest I never own a GHK/ Marui GBBR, I stopped at KSC/KWA LM4. The magazine weight pretty much summarize how GHK has more shots than Marui. (more material to act as a heatsink). My biggest gripe with the whole airsoft GBB thing is: #1 Why are we still running flammable propellant with such

Find systema ptw pins instead they work.

stronger recoil, no noticeable fps increase.

<br />Looks like iotv gen 1<br />//sorry for odd autocorrect words by my phone//<br /><br />

nice review. BTW: you have really really good English (very faint German accent)

This is how madbull/KA system look internally (KA uses 8 ball bearing while Madbull four) h ttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nDMisiZ4_aA

Is the projectile itself less than 40mm in diameter? (ie can you use it in a typical grenade launcher) Also what kind of mechanism is the 40mm base? Is it similiar to Madbull/King Arms or is it much more like ICS? (This would easily determine if one can use CO2 as propellent)

The decision to choose multicam over this was one of few decision that the army made it right. Had the UCP started out with 4 colour with Coyote tan, I'm sure there would've been less complaints. For airsoft point of view, UCP-D is rarer than subdued UCP (with black)

I'm surprised this part is done via CNC, couldn't you do it via mold?

Did you made the custom flute valve or where can it be found?

If you say changes from KSC M4.... KWA totally BS that. Aside from different material use on specific parts, the parts compatiability and dimension were design to be different. Funny thing is that WE M4 Open-Chamber is still allow in US despite having almost 100% parts compatiability with AR-15 (lower receiver, Trigger Group, bolt carrier are the only parts I can think on top of my head that will not work)

not possible due to the two pin hole size differently.

I have to agree with him on that one. WE's plastic is one of the nicest one...when its meant for stock and hanguard.

except its a money sink. To me WE is still the best choice for training rifle if it wasn't for the crappy choice of material.

No They're not, it was a very intentional (making it unable to be release with charging handle) Part #73 (spring) and #56 (plunger) are the evidence There's two detent in the bolt catch which the plunger push into. One is in closed other is when bolt catch engage. This was done simply so that the issue of bolt catch half-engaging bolt carrier does not occur. If you remove the plunger and the spring the magazine itself is NOT sufficient to lock the bolt back.

WA (Standard) M4 mag: 450g WE M4 Gen2 mag: 380g LM4 GI mag: 550g LM4 Pmag 750g 30 rounds of 62gr 5.56 w/ Aluminium GI mag: 480g 30 rounds of 62gr 5.56 w/ PMAG: 520g Why am I surprise people pass on PMAG (functionality-wise)

you'll need spacer if you use no modded buffer. The stock buffer is longer to compensate the 1/4" loss at receiver length. Not as much as my WE M4

Consider ino quality guns runs for $450USD, folks should consider it (Inokatsu ditch the 2nd manufacturer much like they did with Viper....Only the 2nd manufacture is now selling guns at $450-550USD) Co2 is Co2, Propane is different. The fact LM4 works like Ino on propane is a big plus on its performence. It's actually lighter, the weight of KSC M4 vs KWA LM4 mag are the same, I'm guess the PMag are too. I think the weight is around 450g.

See how very few people have VFC GBBR good luck getting a comparison out of it. My comparsion from experience KWA LM4 Realistic Function: (how the gun operates):2.5/5 (Bolt catch do not behave the same, magazine catch is not flush with receiver when magazine seated, selector does not have positive click much like typical AEG) Realistic Dimension:2.5/5 (Receiver is 0.25" shorter than AR-15, Buffer tube is longer to compensate, it's impossible to use ar-15 charging handle due to 3 piece upper design Parts quality and finish:4/5 Receiver feels a bit like plastic due to the finish, ste

....... 1) RA-Tech upgrade is pretty much a must as the firing pin will break with low round count 2) Should be able to work AFAIK 3) Do your research, google is your friend. The answer is there isn't a CO2 mag since STANAG in production 4) AFAIk the typical AK 5) WE VSR style hopup can use heavy weights. I would say 0.28g is bare minimum. I run 0.40g on my WE m4, G39, M16

That is correct, For H&K stuff, all that's left now are KSC Japan and Umarex.

KSC outer barrel. Guarder makes steel and aluminium aftermarket CQBR, M4, and 20" variant WE M4 stock cannot achieve 50m effectively. The shot to shot consistency is extremely poor on the stock bucking.

wow I thought 2 mags dump on we open chamber was amazing.... How's the range? The reports are very erratic right now: -Some say it over hops on 0.25g regardless -Some say range and grouping is poor -Other say the range outgun stock GBBR

If that's true, the fps consistency will be damaged instead. From my experience, TM gas gun are meant to run on very light slide/carrier where as KSC/KWA can run up to about 2X of the weight they used.