Sledge

Why don't people just choose the name they want in the first place?

Wait, wouldn't that name count as "l33tspeak"? And wouldn't that be against forum rules? ... has ORH just asked to have himself banned?

And I presume it also didn't occur to you to actually read the thread, thus finding the instructions on how to request said name change, if you're still selfish enough to want to waste the man's time?

Does it ever occur to you that Arnie might have better things to do than change your name?

Massive cool.

Can't we just change it to "UK" and "Less important places"?

I went to my room, but then I found Resident Evil 4. Now I'm trapped in a loop where I check Arnie's, get told to go to my room, play RE4, come back a couple of hours later, get told to go to my room... you see the problem.

You've made four posts, and created one topic. Have you been starting topics on naughty topics that have been deleted?

Does seem like it would be a fun toy. Replace the bayonet with a rubber blade and rig up a shell-catcher, and you could have a fun skirmish tool.

Review of the GSpec quotes it at 300fps. I don't normally regard pistols as being "a bit low powered" at 280 because my Hi Capa does 300.

280 fps w/.2 is "a bit low"? Compared to what?

So, it's a total change from the normal moderating recruitment process?

Just a thought, but the forum had grown a hell of a lot since it started (we're over 30,000 members now, IIRC). Rather than having a handful of Global Mods trying to deal with everything, why not start creating more subforum mods?

kthnx bai

Did you read what you quoted, only I already answered that.

Actually, the person isn't making a point. They're hinting at what their point might be without having the courtesy to explain it.

I'm going out on a limb here, but could we have a rule that says you're not allowed to quote something someone said, change a couple of words, and post it with the single comment "Fixed"? It was funny for a while, but it's starting to get pretty irritating, and does nothing to forward a discussion.

Damn fine work, sir. But doing that to a PSG-1 is just wrong.

Why not get the Webley bayonet?

I'ma gonna guess not.

You're a trekkie! You sad git!

All those questions are answered by the magic of science fiction. Which would be the point we've been trying to hammer into your skull for the last page or so. If you really care, which I doubt, the generally accepted fanon explanation for trailers, guns, body mass, etc disappearing is subspace. Each TF can access an individually coded "pocket" in subspace to store things in. Therefore, they can stow items that aren't needed, or that they have no room for in their alt mode. They can also stow body mass, in the case of those TFs who change size as part of their transformation. So, for exam

Jag: Nowhere have I suggested that matter is created or destroyed in The Transformers. You seem to have got it into your head that that's what I said. It isn't. Re-read my posts, and try again. Oh, and Star Trek is the show that features the destruction and creation of matter. They refer to it as "the transporter." But... that must mean that an American sci fi show features something that's wrong?

Ho ho! Jag in "totally ignoring what people have said to avoid admitting he's lost an argument" shock! Hold the front page! Again.

I think that people who don't really care about the source material will be fine with it. Thing is, those people would also have been fine with something like the ones I posted. So why not do that, and have a film that appeals to the fanbois and the casual movie-goer?