RC-1138

Medium, fits perfectly. I did a review for it but for some reason the product got places but the review still isn't up yet... never did understand how the review database updates go.. Well only by... maybe $200 USD.... If you think that's nuts I got a Crye Armour Chassis.... that's a good $950 all said and done.... The American tax dollar at work

Like I said they were gifts and the only one I kept was the gold M1911, which I personally liken to a Gold DE in COD4...

That was the basic idea... I actually made those as gifts....

$650 or so, I got it straight from Eagle... don't ask... And it's OD, for some reason the camera I used makes OD stuff look very RG-ish. And I never had a Maritime, my other two vests that are CIRAS are one Phantom Land in small and the other was a medium EI Land and so is this new one.

Took these a long time ago and never really showed em off.

My new Eagle Industries CIRAS, OD Land Type

Kind of a unique direction but... yeah I had to lol

My H&K boys

Good review. Pics would be awesome.

Hmmp, sad. I love my Pelican cases but their damn expensive and since I'm looking at getting another case for my 416 I figured maybe a star would do it but alas... no.

Yeah I have the 1700 and 1750 and I'm worrying whether or not I shoulda just got the 3rd the price star case lol EDIT Well I love the setup, like a British version of my double "SOPMOD-ish (very ish lul)" case; BTW, what's the thing in the upper left corner? And is that the Star SUSAT or a realsteel (looks nice no mater what, and I prefer ACOG's on SA80's)?

I love Star, made the best L85 yet IMO... and M4... and.... well I love Star. Is that the original Star case or a Pelican?

I'm just talking about the Colt M4 and M4A1 (w/ Knight's RIS) which is what I was issued in the US Army and the Colt M4 had a CAR stock, flush with the buffer tube and the M4A1 had a slanted LE Tube w/ LE Stock. Now perhaps the Unit armorer or the US Army for that matter (Ordinance Corps/Quartermaster Corps.... *facepalm*) may switch them upon acquisition of M4/M4A1's but when the troops actually receive them they all have proper fitting tubes and stocks.

Well as a stuck up American and the fact the 416 is designed for the US Military Market, the replica should follow our "clone" (Not much of a clone since their made in Virgina but w/e) and hence they made it incorrect. Regardless it's an easily fixed issue and I've already switched it out with another one.

Shooting Grade Accuracy Grade: 7 Range Grade: 7 Power Grade: 8 Use Grade: 8 So overall shooting grade is a 7, a very average (I am a tough critic though and I would say that a CYMA is way BELOW average while a TM/CA M4 is average as well and a Star or King Arms M4 is a bit above average) Keep in mind this grade is based off of replacing those shoddy parts that are preinstalled and REQUIRE replacement. Conclusion Pros: HK Trademarks Strong Build Solid Build Nice Finish on RAS Good Feel With minor part replacement has very nice performance HK Trad

A few pics of me and my new toy: And “kind of” (very kind of ) T4 impression:

Feel Grade: 9/10 Aesthetics: 9/10 It feels good. If not for the somewhat unfinished texture of the receiver I would say it’s perfect. The feel of the RAS and plastics is solid enough though that you don’t really care about the receiver, which you rarely touch anyway. Aesthetics wise the only reason it doesn’t get a 10 is the stock tube thing. It’s a rather confusing oversight that I’m pretty amazed wasn’t noticed. It doesn’t really detract from the gun but it is something that should have not existed. Shooting Well I had an issue here at first. The gun does

Another note on feel; this gun is VERY solid. There is 0 play anywhere in this gun barring the actual stock (not the tube) itself. The RAS is held on with the same single pin retention screw as the real steel and has the interlocking nub on top of the receiver that keeps it and anything towards the barrel, feeling very solid and 0 wobble. Complete with correct numbering the goes all the way to end of the top of the receiver makes for a nice, appreciable detail. Additionally the forward sight post, which comes unattached, is very strong. A word to the wise; decide whether or not y

The same metal used on the receiver is used on the stock tube, the RIS sights, the gas block, and the rotating front sight. A word on the stock tube, it’s too short. That or the LE stock is too long. Either way there is a space at the end of the tube with the stock fully retracted. A strange oversight that doesn’t really detract from the appearance of the gun but will confuse you at first. This is a comparison pic between the stock tube on a CA M15A4 (OLD “proline”) Clearly the CA is longer but I will say this; upon testing the CA’s old CAR type stock on t

The right side: Heckler & Koch GmbH Made in Germany Heckler & Koch Defense Inc. Sterling VA The left side: HK HK 416 D Cal. 5.56mmx45 Additionally on the left side there’s an HK symbol under the top rail with various manufacture symbols after it, plus a serial number on by the fire selector. And on the front of the receiver: Warning: Read operators manual before use There are additional markings on the gun including ones on the barrel: Might be hard to see but it says HK 5.56mm x 45 Some better pic

D Boys H&K 416 Introduction Heckler and Koch, to airsofters and gun lovers alike it’s a name that brings out all sorts of emotions, some good, some not so good. Love them or hate them though, the fact is a significant number of their designs are found in regular use by soldier and airsofter alike and one of the most coveted designs in both worlds is that of the H&K Model 416. With M-type guns dime a dozen in the airsoft world one more, so called “slightly” innovative design shouldn’t make that big of a swell, as when one version of an M series comes out, forty other companies

I'm going to have to stand to disagree: having used both an M4 and M4A1 (the M4A1 having an LE stock) both where Colt, Government Issue Only and both had stock tubes flush with the end of the stock with the stock collapsed. Anyway I finally finished my review: posts to follow (it's long :S )

That's why I edited lol. Thought of it just as I hit submit... twas too late. But alternatively does it take any modifications to mount on this and (if you know) on any other TM derivative AEG?

Damnit, your making me like the magpul... although I think they look better without the bolt on rails.