SOL

I'm surprised I couldn't find any comparison pics online, but basically looking at them side by side: -The A&K's hand-guard is about an inch shorter in length -With both in carbine configuration, the A&K's barrel is actually almost an inch longer (or at least it looks that way since the handguard is shorter) -The A&K's externals are also noticeably of lower quality, especially when looking at the finish on the barrel. The PTS looks realistically metallic, the A&K is just flat black. -The A&K is around half an inch shorter in height than the PTS -You n

Haha, after I got the A&K Masada I put it besides my Magpul PTS ACR to compare and nearly fell out of my chair laughing. It really is so much smaller! Strangely, the A&K feels much heavier than the PTS version. I'm guessing that is because of the lower quality/heavier polymers and perhaps heavier internals.

Has anyone ever tried Frankensteining an A&K Masada's collapsible stock onto a Magpul PTS ACR? A quick forums search turned up no results. I own the PTS ACR and am soon coming into possession of the A&K Masada, and was just wondering if I could save a few $$$ by not having to buy the PTS folding stock. Is the size/scale difference really to the point where the two stocks are not interchangeable?