ruvon Posted September 20, 2008 Report Share Posted September 20, 2008 Nothing wrong with experimenting and trying new things. That's what leads to innovation. The G36 is far from a perfect weapon. But you can use the parts and accessories available already for that specific piece. What it looks like IMHO is your armorer had a bunch of G-36 parts, and a bunch of M-4 parts, and needed to rig together a gun with what he had. Not a fan of it...but meh... The G-36 is it's own unique piece. Next thing you know, somebody somewhere will be putting M-4 crane stocks on M249's.......oh wait... Link to post Share on other sites
ollie_ty Posted September 20, 2008 Report Share Posted September 20, 2008 What it looks like IMHO is your armorer had a bunch of G-36 parts, and a bunch of M-4 parts, and needed to rig together a gun with what he had. Did you see who posted the picture? Its AirsoftGI. They just throw accessories together to make more variations to sell. So yeah, you're right. Link to post Share on other sites
Domz Posted September 21, 2008 Report Share Posted September 21, 2008 I think HK416 mags look better than those (P?) mags with the g36... if you want to convert at all. But I would say that! Link to post Share on other sites
SHOWEN1976 Posted September 21, 2008 Report Share Posted September 21, 2008 G36K with my girl friend's C-mag . Link to post Share on other sites
The Crunchy Bunny Posted September 21, 2008 Report Share Posted September 21, 2008 ^ Hawt I usually hate C-Mags on anything, but this on this one it looks sweet. Link to post Share on other sites
Marginal Posted September 21, 2008 Report Share Posted September 21, 2008 Sweet indeed, but what's up with that green strap around the handguard? Link to post Share on other sites
justin.kovacs Posted September 21, 2008 Report Share Posted September 21, 2008 Link to post Share on other sites
Fellowz Posted September 21, 2008 Report Share Posted September 21, 2008 anyone got any pics of the G36's used in iron man? there were a few there i liked the look of. Link to post Share on other sites
The Badger Posted September 22, 2008 Report Share Posted September 22, 2008 Link to post Share on other sites
MrBlanks Posted September 22, 2008 Report Share Posted September 22, 2008 (edited) *pic G36K with my girl friend's C-mag . What kind of top rail is that? Edited September 22, 2008 by MrBlanks Link to post Share on other sites
bruin757 Posted September 22, 2008 Report Share Posted September 22, 2008 What kind of top rail is that? Looks like a normal low-profile rail with a popup front and rear sight added on. Link to post Share on other sites
airsoftgi Posted September 22, 2008 Report Share Posted September 22, 2008 How bout these? Link to post Share on other sites
Kingmob3 Posted September 22, 2008 Report Share Posted September 22, 2008 The rail you guys are talking about is called a KSK rail, the sights are the same (or similar to) as the MP7. KM Link to post Share on other sites
mcc-dano Posted September 23, 2008 Report Share Posted September 23, 2008 How bout these? uhh...with fire, you shall kill it. Link to post Share on other sites
MrBlanks Posted September 23, 2008 Report Share Posted September 23, 2008 That's what I thought it was, but I was wondering where he got it as well. As for those guns, the less M4'ish it is, the better. Link to post Share on other sites
M4Man2000 Posted September 23, 2008 Report Share Posted September 23, 2008 That's what I thought it was, but I was wondering where he got it as well. As for those guns, the less M4'ish it is, the better. HA the genreal rule it seems is that G36's are too good for armalites (which is true) thus anything put on them from and Armalite is considered nasty (in the bad way). Link to post Share on other sites
Domz Posted September 24, 2008 Report Share Posted September 24, 2008 I dunno the first one looks alright to me, but then again the SL9 looks good already. This has the advantage of rails being a K... Would prefer it with an SL9 stock personally... Link to post Share on other sites
QDRenegade Posted September 24, 2008 Report Share Posted September 24, 2008 How bout these? http://www.airsoftgi.com/images/GIg36sniperA.jpg http://www.airsoftgi.com/images/GIg36mgpulF.jpg From a design standpoint, youre crossing two totally different animals. Magpul stuff (the PRS and M93B and PMAG, in your case) is utilitarian and scaled (designed) for the likes of an M4. In that sense, the Magpul stuff makes the M4 look more rugged without changing the proportions of the rifle. The G36, however, is more of a sleek (almost sci-fi) looking firearm.... The bulkiness of both stocks (and their size compared to the G36) just doesnt mix. It's kinda like putting a Porsche's whale-tail wing on a Lamborghini Murcielago... Functionally, both are great assets; visually, they just dont make a pleasing mix. I think G36 stocks are best suited for the G36. Same goes for Armalites. Imho the G36 needs sleek parts to keep its sleek appeal. Compare the PRS on this to this. See, in the second photo, how the PRS looks like it just belongs? The lines flow naturally (no doubt one requirement of the PRS design) using both the stock and rifle's appeal together. From a functionality standpoint, those would be interesting setups to try Just my $.02 Link to post Share on other sites
Skarclaw Posted September 24, 2008 Report Share Posted September 24, 2008 The rail you guys are talking about is called a KSK rail, the sights are the same (or similar to) as the MP7. KM No its not, its a chopped g36c rail. KSK rail extends to the back of the receiver, and is taller. Link to post Share on other sites
Marginal Posted September 24, 2008 Report Share Posted September 24, 2008 (edited) How bout these? Heresy! The second one looks ok though. I would attach a different stock but the G36 is good only with it's proprietary addons IMO. Edited September 24, 2008 by Marginal Link to post Share on other sites
airsoftgi Posted September 24, 2008 Report Share Posted September 24, 2008 From a design standpoint, youre crossing two totally different animals. Magpul stuff (the PRS and M93B and PMAG, in your case) is utilitarian and scaled (designed) for the likes of an M4. In that sense, the Magpul stuff makes the M4 look more rugged without changing the proportions of the rifle. The G36, however, is more of a sleek (almost sci-fi) looking firearm.... The bulkiness of both stocks (and their size compared to the G36) just doesnt mix. It's kinda like putting a Porsche's whale-tail wing on a Lamborghini Murcielago... Functionally, both are great assets; visually, they just dont make a pleasing mix. I think G36 stocks are best suited for the G36. Same goes for Armalites. Imho the G36 needs sleek parts to keep its sleek appeal. Compare the PRS on this to this. See, in the second photo, how the PRS looks like it just belongs? The lines flow naturally (no doubt one requirement of the PRS design) using both the stock and rifle's appeal together. From a functionality standpoint, those would be interesting setups to try Just my $.02 Well put, I somewhat agree. At first I didn't particularly like these model either, but they grew on me. The way I see it, it's kind of like when a good friend of yours get glasses or braces put on. It takes getting used to at first, because you're used to seeing them a certain way. Link to post Share on other sites
Scatman Posted September 24, 2008 Report Share Posted September 24, 2008 Heckler Und Koch for the win, honestly why do people butcher g36's a spas 12 stock would look better, I think in the case with most guns and the g36 especially is less is more, sure you could the weird looking ris rail foregrippy thing and 4 m203's but it wouldn't look right jsut liek those g36's, sure they are unique, but unique in a bad way, in a way that makes ghandi cry for blood. Link to post Share on other sites
QDRenegade Posted September 24, 2008 Report Share Posted September 24, 2008 Well put, I somewhat agree. At first I didn't particularly like these model either, but they grew on me. The way I see it, it's kind of like when a good friend of yours get glasses or braces put on. It takes getting used to at first, because you're used to seeing them a certain way. Hmm. Braces and glasses seem to be more astetic than stocks... I believe that replacing a G36 stock with that of an Armalite is more like changing the legs of your friend with those of a horse. That might be a bit harder to get used to! Link to post Share on other sites
Fin Posted September 25, 2008 Report Share Posted September 25, 2008 Using a armalite stock instead of a G36 one means your loosing your ability to fold and your gaining one of (the thousands of) armalite faults by having that huge buffer (?) tube in the way. As for the magazines the Germans decided to use the ones they do because they didnt want to use the ###### STANAG ones. They made theirs to be lighter, more reliable, readily available to clamp together and use see through plastic to see how many rounds are left. These advantages are also incorporated into most airsoft mags too. Personally i prefer the mag release mech over the armasuck style one too IMO the more M4 stuff you use, the more you're shooting yourself in the foot Link to post Share on other sites
NeoVeNoM Posted September 25, 2008 Report Share Posted September 25, 2008 How bout these? I had that m93a stock on mine like a year ago. Switched it back to the original one. You are reinventing the wheel. Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts