Puding Posted August 2, 2007 Report Share Posted August 2, 2007 Their is no reason why it could not be "real" both the G36 and the SPR are 5.56mm and have -14mm threads Well most things can be real, airsoft is mostly about copying a look and i've never seen that set up in the real world so to me it not 'real' in that way. Link to post Share on other sites
screamin_weasel Posted August 2, 2007 Report Share Posted August 2, 2007 I will have agree there, after seeing some pictures in this thread, i will buying one with my next order from RSOV, it may not be 'real' but i do like the looks on a g36k with ag36 and what is airsoft but looks <{POST_SNAPBACK}> lol, that'll be my one Link to post Share on other sites
newbkiller Posted August 2, 2007 Report Share Posted August 2, 2007 well, I ordered an element FTK, spr flash hider, and CA inner barrel for it last night from gunner. going to order an ar-15 stock adapter and c-mag for it from rsov very soon. Link to post Share on other sites
BP-anon Posted August 3, 2007 Report Share Posted August 3, 2007 well, I ordered an element FTK, spr flash hider, and CA inner barrel for it last night from gunner. going to order an ar-15 stock adapter and c-mag for it from rsov very soon. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> use this stock http://www.rsov.com/store/product_info.php...e928252bcb2d0ea Please Link to post Share on other sites
msx361 Posted August 3, 2007 Report Share Posted August 3, 2007 Why a CA inner barrel? Link to post Share on other sites
newbkiller Posted August 3, 2007 Report Share Posted August 3, 2007 benplaut, I plan on starting with my bdoys le stock and maybe moving up to an ACM Magpul CTR copy. msx361, I like CA barrels because they are 6.04mm and are very cheap. Link to post Share on other sites
BP-anon Posted August 5, 2007 Report Share Posted August 5, 2007 Ooh... CTR could look pretty good g'luck Link to post Share on other sites
evilliboba Posted August 7, 2007 Report Share Posted August 7, 2007 Muahahaa HK Trademarks FTW. Bad attempt at an artsy photo with my MP7 and Multicam cap. Link to post Share on other sites
newbkiller Posted August 7, 2007 Report Share Posted August 7, 2007 you have the army code body, why didn't you use the army code magwell? sorry, but your paintjob is just really lumpy looking. Link to post Share on other sites
Azulsky Posted August 7, 2007 Report Share Posted August 7, 2007 (edited) How old or new is that army code body, i see they still never fixed the Bmbh to Gmbh, oh well, not that i care about trades or that the g36 really needs a new body Have we ever confirmed whether they are accurate, i havent seen a closeups of a g36k but on the c model realsteel the only trades are written in that box nothing in front, on the left side at least Edited August 7, 2007 by Azulsky Link to post Share on other sites
poorieuser Posted August 7, 2007 Report Share Posted August 7, 2007 (edited) From the pics I've seen it looks like they're only in that box. http://www.internalgrey.de/pix/bw/nsa.jpg Edited August 7, 2007 by poorieuser Link to post Share on other sites
MP5SD5 Posted August 7, 2007 Report Share Posted August 7, 2007 (edited) The army code body is based on the American Civilian Trades. Thats what I read anyway, hence the stuff "outside the box". Regards, 'd5 EDIT: Evilliboba- whats your opinion on the split top rail and flip-up sights? As I like m16 style sights, but don't want to spend $90 odd on them if they suck! Are they adjustable and do they interfere with a low mounted aimpoint when folded? thanks, 'd5 Edited August 7, 2007 by MP5SD5 Link to post Share on other sites
evilliboba Posted August 7, 2007 Report Share Posted August 7, 2007 you have the army code body, why didn't you use the army code magwell? sorry, but your paintjob is just really lumpy looking. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> The Army Code Magwell would not feed with my mags. The reason it looks bumpy is the three or four different coats of paint on it. I will be stripping it down and respraying it to get it smoother. EDIT: Evilliboba- whats your opinion on the split top rail and flip-up sights? As I like m16 style sights, but don't want to spend $90 odd on them if they suck! Are they adjustable and do they interfere with a low mounted aimpoint when folded? thanks, 'd5 <{POST_SNAPBACK}> I personally like them. They do what they are designed to do. They stay out of the way until you need them. The only way it could interfere with an Aimpoint is if you had it mounted back far enough with the rear sight up. In that combination you would not be able to open or close the rear lens cover. They they lock up solid and adjusting then is very easy. Though, mine are not the cheap Classic Army replica. Mine are TGS, and it cost me around $170 total. Link to post Share on other sites
MP5SD5 Posted August 7, 2007 Report Share Posted August 7, 2007 ahhh, darn shame, I don't have that kinda money, it sucks being 14 sometimes Oh well, I love my g36, so easy to field strip, sooo easy to work on! w00t for g36'es Link to post Share on other sites
evilliboba Posted August 7, 2007 Report Share Posted August 7, 2007 ahhh, darn shame, I don't have that kinda money, it sucks being 14 sometimes Oh well, I love my g36, so easy to field strip, sooo easy to work on! w00t for g36'es <{POST_SNAPBACK}> You don't have to worry about that kind of money. They are not made anymore. So all you have to choose from is the CA replica. Also I'm not saying that the CA is a bad cheap, just cheaper. Plus mine has something that CA will never have. KAC Trademarks. Link to post Share on other sites
[-=O=-]^{Woozie} Posted August 8, 2007 Report Share Posted August 8, 2007 (edited) but KAC is about... 100% more dear then the CA one... and apparently, the CA one have their rearsight mounted blackwards... ar well, who will give a toss? since you will probably snap on an aimpoint on it anyway EDIT: btw, Evil, nice setup , I am doing the same as yours but with a G36c and a sliencer. Edited August 8, 2007 by [-=O=-]^{Woozie} Link to post Share on other sites
sekiryu Posted August 8, 2007 Report Share Posted August 8, 2007 The army code body is based on the American Civilian Trades. Which, instead of saying HK G36, would read HK SL8-1/2/3/4/5/6/7/8/9. Link to post Share on other sites
evilliboba Posted August 8, 2007 Report Share Posted August 8, 2007 EDIT: btw, Evil, nice setup , I am doing the same as yours but with a G36c and a sliencer. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Going for that Point of Existence look? Link to post Share on other sites
[-=O=-]^{Woozie} Posted August 8, 2007 Report Share Posted August 8, 2007 oh... Point of Existence... didn't know it was MOD for BF2, look nice and no, I just like the G36c becoz the 36c is big enough for me already! *yes, I am only 5'3 * Link to post Share on other sites
ollie_ty Posted August 8, 2007 Report Share Posted August 8, 2007 (edited) Which, instead of saying HK G36, would read HK SL8-1/2/3/4/5/6/7/8/9. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Sekiryu, He means the bit "Outside The Box", as in the "Refer to instruction manual" bit. Edited August 8, 2007 by ollie_ty Link to post Share on other sites
Seraph Posted August 10, 2007 Report Share Posted August 10, 2007 you like my g...um...g4? Link to post Share on other sites
Llama Posted August 11, 2007 Report Share Posted August 11, 2007 Yikes . At least have the decency to lose the m203. Link to post Share on other sites
my_plague_666 Posted August 11, 2007 Report Share Posted August 11, 2007 personally i think the 203 looks a lot nicer than the AG36. Link to post Share on other sites
Slash' Posted August 11, 2007 Report Share Posted August 11, 2007 It certainly looks no worse, IMO. Link to post Share on other sites
my_plague_666 Posted August 11, 2007 Report Share Posted August 11, 2007 oh i wont deny that the rails, stock and silencer make it look worse but M203 are (IMO) some of the better looking GLs out there (the AG36 being one of the worse, but still no where near as ugly as the EGLM) Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts