RUSHER2 Posted December 16, 2008 Report Share Posted December 16, 2008 (edited) Isn't that a little excessive? Not quite. especialy when you want closest to the real steel stuff Edited December 16, 2008 by RUSHER2 Link to post Share on other sites
Vercingetorix Posted December 16, 2008 Report Share Posted December 16, 2008 lol, get a loverly SR-16 metal body and cover the beautiful trades in paint Link to post Share on other sites
Magsz Posted December 16, 2008 Report Share Posted December 16, 2008 lol, get a loverly SR-16 metal body and cover the beautiful trades in paint Im going to second that. Corps, a year ago i would have agreed with you. Honestly though man, ive stopped putting real steel parts on my guns beyond back up iron sights and SOME stocks simply because the airsoft BUIS's and stocks (depending on model) are generally terrible. Everything else is functionally sound as far as im concerned. The only part that really doesnt cut the mustard these days are the metal body kits but again, depending on manufacturer they're close enough. I really do think that MOST people spend money on airsoft guns for all of the wrong reasons. The retards at my local site that are bragging about real steel parts on their airsoft TOYS just get a chuckle from me. We as americans have a right to own firearms, we dont need firearms grade accessories on our guns. Sure, we have the CHOICE to add them but again, my entire point here is that too many people think real steel parts make their airsoft gun better somehow. The simple fact of the matter is that it just makes it more expensive, which as far as im concerned, makes it WORSE. At the end of the day though, its all about choice i respect everyone's opinion and their desire to do whatever the heck they want to do. Still, the chuckleheads that think they're stroking their ego by posting their overpriced toys on an internet forum get a snicker of derision from me because quite frankly, i think they're seriously lacking in the testosterone and logic department. Also, im not targeting anyone in this thread either, i think that WA is pretty neat. I think its way too expensive for what it is and i think Kalmar is NUTS for spending that much money on a platform thats not even really that good BUT im still envious of it simply because its a nice piece AND i bet its fun to shoot. Kudo's kal, you crazy bastidge, i really hope you enjoy the hell out of it! Link to post Share on other sites
Kalmar Posted December 16, 2008 Report Share Posted December 16, 2008 (edited) Everyone who believes I have spent an absurd amount of money on this project should seriously check out my paintball gun As a hardcore mil-sim enthusiast, eight years of scenario paintball just didn't provide me with the realism I needed to enjoy myself or the game I played. When I decided to take up airsoft I knew I wanted the most true to life experience and the WA M4 is unquestionably just that. Yes it is costly, and possesses inherent limitations in accuracy and service life, but those drawbacks are tremendously outwheighed (at least in my opinion) by the pure joy of feeling that kick in the shoulder every time you squeez the trigger; The panic and sense of urgency in the middle of a firefight once your bolt locks back when your magazine is spent; And that ultimate badass sensation when you rack a fresh round in the chamber, ready to kick *albatross* again. For me or anyone else who this sounds appealing to, the WA simply can't be beat. Now in furthering my defense, the real steel parts are there because I will in fact be purchasing a real AR in the near future - and I'd like to transfer as much as possible. Regardless, RS parts are no doubt built to higher specs which are not required for typical airsoft use, then again, the WA is not your typical airsoft gun (and if it hasn't been established already, I am not the typical airsoft player.) Aside from the stock and sight, which are there for personal necessity, I see no validity to the "totally unessesary" argument. lol, get a loverly SR-16 metal body and cover the beautiful trades in paint Surpisingly, I agree completely. With hindsight I would not paint my WA again - I'm even considering scraping these parts and starting again The trades were really what made this gun special. The paint largely made them disappear as expected however they are still noticeable at close range. It's nearly impossible to see on camera, only in person does the light reflect to show the engravings but you can try to discern them here. I am verry upset with myself now and dreppessed at the thought of spending another $400 on parts I already own but I'm afriad that's what's next. Edited December 16, 2008 by Kalmar Link to post Share on other sites
Kalmar Posted December 16, 2008 Report Share Posted December 16, 2008 (edited) One more thing I'd like to add is in regard to the "all the wrong reasons" comment made in Maqsz post. I feel that the usual bragging and one-upmanship is unavoidable at least in airsoft's demographic. It's one thing when you're spoiled and spending your parent's money, but another when you purposely spend all available funds to grow your 'e-peen'. In some rare instances such as my own, this is due to the fact that airsoft is a passion and something worth spending time, effort and money on. I'm now a full time student, but thankfully due to my brief yet illustrious career as a profesional gamer (lol no seriously) I have been able to spend my own money, on my own hobby, for me - and that's all that matters. Edited December 16, 2008 by Kalmar Link to post Share on other sites
Vercingetorix Posted December 16, 2008 Report Share Posted December 16, 2008 Acetone or paint remover? Get that tan gunk off a there and paint the stock black to match instead Link to post Share on other sites
Kalmar Posted December 16, 2008 Report Share Posted December 16, 2008 Acetone or paint remover? Get that tan gunk off a there and paint the stock black to match instead I'm afraid I'd strip the original finish completely. If that's the case I could try anodizing Link to post Share on other sites
Delta14 Posted December 19, 2008 Report Share Posted December 19, 2008 Do G&P SR-25's use the same kind of gearbox as M4's? Link to post Share on other sites
KTcerberus Posted December 19, 2008 Report Share Posted December 19, 2008 No they use a longer gearbox and PSG 1 type pistons and sector gears. Link to post Share on other sites
Vercingetorix Posted December 19, 2008 Report Share Posted December 19, 2008 Not all of them, some use the v2 box and an extended nozzle, etc.... Link to post Share on other sites
Apache137 Posted December 19, 2008 Report Share Posted December 19, 2008 Do G&P SR-25's use the same kind of gearbox as M4's? Not all of them, some use the v2 box and an extended nozzle, etc.... ? there arent different versions of the GP SR25s are there? aside form externals that is... and if you're referring to the GG half-assed excuse for an sr25.... then its not an sr25 so that doesnt count... is the CA a "clone/copy" of the GP? Link to post Share on other sites
Whan Posted December 19, 2008 Report Share Posted December 19, 2008 (edited) I'm afraid I'd strip the original finish completely. If that's the case I could try anodizing What'd you paint it with? If it was simply Krylon, I've heard Brake fluid does wonders. As for stripping the original finish, I'm pretty sure brake fluid won't do it. Some guy removed Duracoat http://www.ar15.com/lite/topic.html?b=6&am...19&t=239839 by dipping it in paint thinner for an hour.... and the black anodized finish is still there. If the G&P anodization is even half as strong, it'll be fine by just rubbing brake fluid on there. Although I'm not sure about the laser engravings... I think it should be fiine though. Also, don't sue me if im wrong Edit: It seems that the G&P body is anodized, and the laser engravings should be really permanent. http://www.lazerdesigns.com/help/laserengraved.html Maybe. Edited December 19, 2008 by Whan Link to post Share on other sites
Nookie Posted December 22, 2008 Report Share Posted December 22, 2008 M110 wannabee Link to post Share on other sites
The Crunchy Bunny Posted December 22, 2008 Report Share Posted December 22, 2008 ^HAWTness Link to post Share on other sites
KTcerberus Posted December 22, 2008 Report Share Posted December 22, 2008 Now get a G&P M110 front end and it will be as close as you can get for the moment since no one makes an accurate receiver. Link to post Share on other sites
Nookie Posted December 23, 2008 Report Share Posted December 23, 2008 Now get a G&P M110 front end and it will be as close as you can get for the moment since no one makes an accurate receiver. after the tune-up made to this rifle i barely have enough $ left to buy the proper front end kit but i'm pretty pleased with it and it's performance Link to post Share on other sites
the.jaguar Posted December 24, 2008 Report Share Posted December 24, 2008 ^ Thats a nice XM110, but I would prefer the original grip... Link to post Share on other sites
navymp28 Posted December 30, 2008 Report Share Posted December 30, 2008 Link to post Share on other sites
Delta14 Posted December 30, 2008 Report Share Posted December 30, 2008 Is that an M110? Link to post Share on other sites
KTcerberus Posted December 30, 2008 Report Share Posted December 30, 2008 Nope, looks like some form of MK11. And real steel at that judging by the HESCO barrier. Link to post Share on other sites
navymp28 Posted December 30, 2008 Report Share Posted December 30, 2008 (edited) Look at the receiver...SR25 or MK11 if you wish. Yeah it's a real SR25 not an Airsoft one. I thought it was intresting seeing a Surefire on it. Pretty cool gun..alot more front heavy than I thought it would be as well. Most of the Scout Snipers I talked too didn't like it though(But there where a couple that liked it..hence the pics)..they prefered the M40A1. The Seal snipers I have talked too love it though...go figure. Edited December 30, 2008 by navymp28 Link to post Share on other sites
Delta14 Posted December 30, 2008 Report Share Posted December 30, 2008 I has a continous rail on the top and a flash hider the SR-25 has neither. M110 - http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/comm...10_ECP_Left.jpg SR-25 - http://world.guns.ru/sniper/sr25-mk11m0-1.jpg Link to post Share on other sites
Magsz Posted December 30, 2008 Report Share Posted December 30, 2008 I has a continous rail on the top and a flash hider the SR-25 has neither. M110 - http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/comm...10_ECP_Left.jpg SR-25 - http://world.guns.ru/sniper/sr25-mk11m0-1.jpg Rofl... So you're disagreeing with the original poster, ie navymp, the guy that took the photo? Man... Link to post Share on other sites
Delta14 Posted December 30, 2008 Report Share Posted December 30, 2008 (edited) I'm sorry I see it has SR-25 markings. I don't want to cause any more trouble so I'll just shut up. Edited December 30, 2008 by Delta14 Link to post Share on other sites
Hispeed1 Posted December 30, 2008 Report Share Posted December 30, 2008 I'm sorry I see it has SR-25 markings. I don't want to cause any more trouble so I'll just shut up. It's an SR-25, but with an M110 front end. Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts