Jump to content

BNP candidate in punch-up


Stealthbomber

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 61
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Apparently Nick Griffin (head dribbling prat of the uBNP for any colonists who don't know who he is) suggested that Labour was going to win unfairly purely because they had managed to encourage a high turnout in Barking, which he said disadvantaged the uBNP.

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 2 weeks later...

He's hiding being a suit, when in actual fact he's clearly a scummy thug. To be fair the bloke who spat at him was a bit of a plonker for doing so - regardless of race; it just seems like a punch up between a group of morons who seem insistant on stealing my oxygen!

Link to post
Share on other sites

He's hiding being a suit, when in actual fact he's clearly a scummy thug. To be fair the bloke who spat at him was a bit of a plonker for doing so - regardless of race; it just seems like a punch up between a group of morons who seem insistant on stealing my oxygen!

Good to see a few more intelligent and balanced views, rather than the usual lefty apologists making excuses for minorities (when race doesn't even come into it)...

Link to post
Share on other sites

lol got to laugh at that the asians were out numbered and still started a fight, the bnp dude should have seen it being recorded and not reacted that would have made the asians look stupid

 

Either way it stupid from both angles

Link to post
Share on other sites

Good to see a few more intelligent and balanced views, rather than the usual lefty apologists making excuses for minorities (when race doesn't even come into it)...

 

I find these kind of comments weird when you complain about people using the word 'Brit'.

Link to post
Share on other sites

According to the uBNP, losing about 3/4 of their deposits (£500 each) is an outstanding success.

They're also claiming an increase in the number of votes since 2005 (uBNP:"Total votes cast 563,743. This compares with 192,746 votes secured by the BNP in 117 seats in 2005"), unfortunately their maths suck.

 

2005 - 192,745 votes for 119 candidates = average of 1620 votes per candidate

2010 - 563,743 votes for 338 candidates = average of 1668 votes per candidate.

 

Wow - an average increase of 48 votes per candidate, or a swing of 2.97%! The landslide begins here (but at this rate, it may take a couple of thousand years).

Link to post
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and the use of session cookies.