christhesecond Posted June 21, 2006 Report Share Posted June 21, 2006 ok so ive just been very lucky with ebay and have run into about 850 quid i have a slr105 witha gp-30 which i love but i would like to get something different im so damn confused as to what to get its beyond a joke i have narrowed it down to 3 options what follows is me being bored and trying to weigh up what would be the better options in an especially sad format based on the hours that i have spent scouring the internet for info on each I WOULD LOVE ANYBODY TO ADD TO WHAT I HAVE PUT TO HELP AID MY DECISION for example more speficic stats or basically anything i have missed Airsoft investment comparison Minimi CQBr ICS M4 para fps- 328 (with 1j spring), 328, 328 rof- Very high, High, high range- ? ? ? price- 720, 350, 270 Price with extras -830, 500, 400 realism- Full metal, Full metal, Full metal weight- Very heavy, Quite heavy, Quite heavy size- big, Compact, Very compact Customisability- poor, Very good, Very good Scare factor- Watch them run, Average, average General s3x factor- 9/10, 8/10, 7.5/10 reliability- 8/10, 8/10, ? General strength- 10/10, 9/10, 8/10 Battery capacity- Large with battery sling, Average size in peq or stock, Average size in peq availability Whenever, Whenever, 1 month Other points Minimi pro’s: - would get elcan or “elken” scope ftw - very useful for use at my favourite site (it’s basically think woodland making it a cross between woodland and cqb - quick change spring - bipod cons: - battery in sling is the best option for me as I’m not good with internals and wouldn’t be confident taking it apart to rewire it into the battery - ridiculous price cqbr pro’s: - general s3x0r look - would get a ris m203 cons: - crane stock is fiddly ics m4 para pro’s: - comes with a ridiculous amount of free stuff such as a gripod and 2 hi caps to list a few!! - quick change gearbox (good to get one with an m100 for ground zero) - couldn’t be a better choice for cqb (imo) with a folding stock - would get a ris m203 cons: - not sure of how reliable they would be with all the upgrades as they aren’t released yet Link to post Share on other sites
christhesecond Posted June 21, 2006 Author Report Share Posted June 21, 2006 sorry for the slight muddling of the table, i pasted it from word and forgot that the posts dont use anything like tables Link to post Share on other sites
Lance Jackass Posted June 21, 2006 Report Share Posted June 21, 2006 CQBR. Best VCR investment i'd say as parts are easily available from a multitude of companies. Link to post Share on other sites
christhesecond Posted June 21, 2006 Author Report Share Posted June 21, 2006 does the cqbr reliably take a 9.6v out of the box? thanks for your help btw Link to post Share on other sites
Nothingness Posted June 21, 2006 Report Share Posted June 21, 2006 CQB... I assume you mean Classic Army's? If so I'd get that, since the M4 Para's design is... laughable, to say the least. Link to post Share on other sites
christhesecond Posted June 21, 2006 Author Report Share Posted June 21, 2006 yeah i mean the CA what do you mean by laughable? is it because you hate the stock cos the stock is a bit of a marmite thing Link to post Share on other sites
Nothingness Posted June 21, 2006 Report Share Posted June 21, 2006 I don't like the stock, and doesn't the vertical grip serve as a bipod as well? Either way, I hear great things about the the M15 CQB, and if I could afford it, I'd get it, although I also think it's a bit ugly... but oh well, maybe I'm just too picky. Link to post Share on other sites
Lance Jackass Posted June 21, 2006 Report Share Posted June 21, 2006 I would have thought that the CA would take 9.6vs fine, but you'd need to double check. The minimi is a great gun, but a bit long, a bit heavy. Now some people like that, some don't and the only real way to find out is playing a day with it. Which means risking it. The ICS gun is - well allright. The internals are nice, its very practical and the stock and RIS grip are like you said, "marmite." But the gearbox isn't the normal AEG size. So if you decided suddenly that you wanted to do say a Shrike conversion or make it into an M16A2, you couldn't get the metal reciever to fit it. The CQB has nice internals, build quality etc and has fully TM,G&G,G&P etc parts. I'd get that personally. Link to post Share on other sites
raj_uk Posted June 21, 2006 Report Share Posted June 21, 2006 get a G&P M4 CQBR then you can pimp around like I do with mine p.s. The crane stock isn't fiddly. Battery in the stock balances the gun nicely too Link to post Share on other sites
christhesecond Posted June 21, 2006 Author Report Share Posted June 21, 2006 lol mate, i saw that picture of yours a while ago and its one of the reasons i want one so much cos of that pic, nice one old son. do you use a 9.6v and if so did it take it out of the box? Link to post Share on other sites
phoenixkskg Posted June 21, 2006 Report Share Posted June 21, 2006 get a G&P M4 CQBR then you can pimp around like I do with mine p.s. The crane stock isn't fiddly. Battery in the stock balances the gun nicely too <{POST_SNAPBACK}> God.. that is pure sex. Link to post Share on other sites
Lightbulb Posted June 21, 2006 Report Share Posted June 21, 2006 m15 CQB ROCKS! I wish i had spent the extra and got one now. With all the guys i play regularly with we pretty much own the entire range of guns - obviosuly not old sk00l CO2 tank guns and the like but more modern stuff yes. There minimi, sniper rifles upgraded to whatever, m4's g36, augs, FAMAS, etc etc. You know the only gun we don't want the opposition to have? The CA m15 CQB with a 10.8 battery... Its really really nice. Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.