menatarms Posted August 17, 2006 Report Share Posted August 17, 2006 With the lithion batteries & that clever thing with the HK PDW folding stock laced with ni-cads, there must be a way to get this made, huh ? Nice ? Different, aye ? .PDF pamphlet for Knight's PDW Link to post Share on other sites
MagicalNinjaBuddy Posted August 17, 2006 Report Share Posted August 17, 2006 Like that? Link to post Share on other sites
darkchild130 Posted August 17, 2006 Report Share Posted August 17, 2006 but with a different forend and different sights and a different length barrel and a different grip and a different stock yeah, totally like that! Darkchild Link to post Share on other sites
Nello Posted August 17, 2006 Report Share Posted August 17, 2006 Ah the wonders of KAC.... Link to post Share on other sites
MagicalNinjaBuddy Posted August 17, 2006 Report Share Posted August 17, 2006 but with a different forend and different sights and a different length barrel and a different grip and a different stock yeah, totally like that! Darkchild <{POST_SNAPBACK}> You can add the flip-up sights and...a new grip...and stuff. Link to post Share on other sites
Angry Posted August 17, 2006 Report Share Posted August 17, 2006 I really do like that little CA Link to post Share on other sites
Donut Posted August 17, 2006 Report Share Posted August 17, 2006 I don't think we could get that rail system... or it'd be very expensive, and I'd imagine it'd be a ***** trying to get the batteries in and out as you'd have to remove the rail system every single time... Link to post Share on other sites
darkchild130 Posted August 17, 2006 Report Share Posted August 17, 2006 You can add the flip-up sights and...a new grip...and stuff. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> I know, it's just fun being an *albatross* sometimes. It would make a cool project though. Darkchild Link to post Share on other sites
ColSanders Posted August 17, 2006 Report Share Posted August 17, 2006 Err hate to burst everyone's bubble it's a one piece system with the reciever, so unless you mill one of your own you won't get anything like that... Link to post Share on other sites
Donut Posted August 17, 2006 Report Share Posted August 17, 2006 Well, I guess you could mod the upper with plastic instead of metal... It'll be much easier... IMO all you really need are M16/M4 base gun, some sheet styrene, M16 foregrip rail, new barrel, new flashhider, new stock, sights, thermold mags, and a M16A1 grip. It'll be close enough. Link to post Share on other sites
boosterboy Posted August 17, 2006 Report Share Posted August 17, 2006 Err hate to burst everyone's bubble it's a one piece system with the reciever, so unless you mill one of your own you won't get anything like that... <{POST_SNAPBACK}> +1 people are too careless these days to judge a gun by the receiver, they're too busy looking at the other stuff. Link to post Share on other sites
Ledpocket Posted August 17, 2006 Report Share Posted August 17, 2006 MRP kit will get you close: http://www.wgcshop.com/pcart/shopper.php?i...at_JET%20Custom A hacksaw could take it to 90% Link to post Share on other sites
Zero_DgZ Posted August 17, 2006 Report Share Posted August 17, 2006 Eh. You should see the violence I have to do to my MP5 these days to get the battery in there. I had to make a custom one just to have a chance of packing enough volts and amps into that thing. Link to post Share on other sites
pillow_pwnage Posted August 18, 2006 Report Share Posted August 18, 2006 We had a long topic about this on ASR, unless a kit is made by a mainstream maker, it isn't cost effective in the least. Too many custom parts would be needed, changing batteries would be a pain, mags would have to be heavily modded from a M16 base. The PDW won't see airsoft any time soon. Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Posted August 18, 2006 Report Share Posted August 18, 2006 You could maybe just use a battery sling/bag, thermold mags and do what LEDpocket said, change the flashider, custom stock and the jobs a good 'un Link to post Share on other sites
pillow_pwnage Posted August 18, 2006 Report Share Posted August 18, 2006 Not really. Monolithic upper receiver, different gas system, different mag angle, odd barrel, odd pistol grip, stock doesn't exist in airsoft form (at least not correctly). But don't mind me, I'm anal about realism. Especially when it involves KAC. Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Posted August 18, 2006 Report Share Posted August 18, 2006 The one linked is all one piece (I assume that's what monolithic means), I'm sure you could customise a standard pistol grip and someone could make/customise a stock, barrel could probably be customised too. Mag angle most people could live with, same with the gas system. Link to post Share on other sites
hsimoorb Posted August 18, 2006 Report Share Posted August 18, 2006 6x35mm? Wierd. Also means it'd be HARD to make an airsoft version of it that's skimrishable, unless you made your own mags. OT, what's the balistics like on the 6mm cartridge? Link to post Share on other sites
pillow_pwnage Posted August 18, 2006 Report Share Posted August 18, 2006 Superior to both .223 and 7.62x39 out to 400 meters. Link to post Share on other sites
Ledpocket Posted August 21, 2006 Report Share Posted August 21, 2006 Ok, so I took a crack at making an approximation of this. I'm no KAC nut, so some of the details are missing, and I took a few liberties. Aside from that, I think the r/s is still a little long, so I made a shorter one. Based it off a "tec 9" tube I made up a few months ago. SRC m4, a bunch of rails, mp7 sights, various aluminum chunks, and a pile of screws. Here it is: Link to post Share on other sites
pillow_pwnage Posted August 21, 2006 Report Share Posted August 21, 2006 MEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEYEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE EEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYEEEEE EEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEESSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS Link to post Share on other sites
newbkiller Posted August 21, 2006 Report Share Posted August 21, 2006 IDK what m4 meant but I think that's awsome. great work, as always, ledpocket. however, I believe mkaing a more angular upper would look better/ more accurate. I'd really like to try this with something like a well r-6/7 because it would be cheap if I *fruitecaged* it up. Link to post Share on other sites
hsimoorb Posted August 21, 2006 Report Share Posted August 21, 2006 Superior to both .223 and 7.62x39 out to 400 meters. OK...in what ways. On that fact sheet it compared the 6x35s to the 5.56 that shot "2400 FPS" out of an M4. But the quoted the M4 barrel length as 10 inches, rather than 14.5 inches. Of coarse with the REAL length M4 barrel the 223 gets much more power than they claimed. And even when they cheated on thier facts the 6mm round had less energy at the muzzle. They also did not state the balistic coefficient, or how much energy the round keeps downrange. Assuming round is the same weight as the 223, like is says on thier page, and moves slower, you have to assume that it's actualy worse at range than a 223, with a more dramatic bullet drop, and less armour penetration at range. I might beleive that the round performs better than a 223 out of a 10 inch barrel, but not a 223 out of a 14 inch plus. Link to post Share on other sites
Ledpocket Posted August 21, 2006 Report Share Posted August 21, 2006 IDK what m4 meant but I think that's awsome. great work, as always, ledpocket. however, I believe mkaing a more angular upper would look better/ more accurate. I'd really like to try this with something like a well r-6/7 because it would be cheap if I *fruitecaged* it up. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> If you're talking about my post, "src m4" meant that I used an src m4a1 as the base gun. As for the angles on the tube, I agree. But I don't have any hex shaped tubing (I'm not sure you can get it, unless you pay for an extrusion die) But yeah, I'm pretty happy with the results of my weekend bodge job. btw, it shoots 6mm .2's at approximately 260/270 fps (which is about the only ballistics relevant to this forum) I'm looking forward to seeing other's attempts at this Link to post Share on other sites
Donut Posted August 21, 2006 Report Share Posted August 21, 2006 I would... but first I need a M4 base. I don't think V6's can get the job done. Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.