Jump to content

DarkLite

Commercial User
  • Content Count

    9,491
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    50

Posts posted by DarkLite

  1. I was already thinking about that, yes.

    Right now i have an issue with the ASCU, after 1 shot the ASCU put the replica  in Alarm-mode.

    When i unscrew the spring guide (less tension) the replica functions again.

     

    That being said: Airsoft Systems recommend an HT motor, but i have still the stock Specna motor  :unsure:

     

    That's because the ASCU without the anti reversal is relying on the motor to stop the geartrain from reversing. If the motor isn't strong enough (IE: the stock ferrite 32tpa motor that Specna supplies which is identical to the old Chaoli stock motors that all the ACM AEGs come with) then the motor will need more current to apply the braking force to stop the gearbox in the right place, leading to a current spike the ASCU thinks is indicative of a problem - hence the alarm mode.

     

    If you have a strong neodynium motor in there, it won't need so much current to apply braking force and as such will hold better. But if you have an anti reversal in there it won't need to apply any braking force at all, leading to a longer life span for the motor and the geartrain, as well as your battery.

     

    This is one of the reasons I really dislike the ASG CZ Skorpion, because they completely removed any provision for the anti-reversal, meaning you reduce the range of motors you can use with the AEG and still have it work reliably.

     

    Essentially: this is a very complicated and unreliable method of solving the problem that the antireversal already fixes.

     

    The ONLY justification for removing the antireversal is to avoid the 'Semi-auto lock up' issue that sometimes arises when the geartrain comes to rest with the cut off lever engaged in semi auto, resulting in a locked trigger until you switch to full auto and fire again.

     

    The proper way to deal with that issue is to change the sector gear cam's shape:

     

    sector%20cams_zpszqaopq4r.jpg

     

    But in all honesty, I don't encounter this issue much unless you have a very underpowered battery. 99.99% of gearboxes will never see this issue.

    • Like 1
  2.  

     

    Steel hammer, sear, firing pin.

    My WELL trigger box is not steel.

     

    Do you mean the casing or the parts? There is only a few parts which is made from steel.

    This week we got 9 G74A and all of them has steel hammer-sear.

     

    The other thing is that the last year series has less steel parts (but the hammer-sear was steel). They has externally less steel as the 2016-series.

     

    The box is pot metal, the hammer, disconnector and firing pin are steel, as I said before.

     

    The only thing I would have said they need to make steel now is the trigger/main sear. Eventually that will break and render the gun totally inoperable.

  3. Basic look over:

     

    Steel hammer, sear, firing pin. Plastic buffer in the receiver. Non captive recoil spring. I got a gas magazine with mine, which leaks from both the top and bottom valves. However, WE magazines fit and fire.

     

    Outer barrel is not steel, unlike the WE.

     

    My WELL has an issue with alignment of the gas piston, when it's fully tightened it sits 10degrees low so it rubs against the gas tube.
     

  4. Would you say it was worth it? How stable is the grip?

     

    I didn't do a great job of the modification. I know how I could do it properly now, but hindsight is 20/20. Mine isn't very stable but if you modify the hole in the receiver to fit the adaptor it should be. I modified the adaptor to fit the hole in the receiver and that was the wrong thing to do.

  5. Awesome. Can you check if they provide the same FPS output? 

     

    Really, really want to see a complete review / comparison of these guns

     

    When I have the time I'll be doing a side by side comparison to my WE AKSU.

     

    From first impressions though, the WELL magazine seal is much much harder than the WE one, so I dunno if it'll seal as well.

    • Like 1
  6. Got a hold of the WELL clone. Initial inspection shows it to be a more or less 100% clone of the WE, with some simplifications done to make it easier to manufacture. Magazines are compatible, but I'll have to take it totally apart to check the FCG.

     

    Externally, not as nice as the WE. But for the price it's an excellent start, plus they made CO2 magazines.

    • Like 1
  7. You said it. Our "WE" RPK is the only gun I've seen that really keeps enemy heads down. There's something in that noise that affects them psychologically. 

     

    Why not go for the clasic 7.62x39mm RPK instead of the RPK-74? The drum mag would be more correct (there are not such thing as 5.45x39mm drum mags), and the conversion should be easier as you can use the WE PMC gas block, front sight, etc..

     

    I could do but I prefer the look of the 74. I know the drum isn't kosher but I can just pretend it's a special caliber conversion...

  8. I have 4 of these, two side folders and two full stock - at the moment I have them set up as an AKSU with wood and bakelite, an FSB style AK105 with rails up the wazzoo, an AIMS with the folding stock and wooden donkey *rickroll* foregrip, and an AK74m with ZENIT everything.

     

    All of them have upgraded trigger sets - 3x HP and 1x RAT and they all work fine, all are super accurate and generally awesome.

    I just really want to get another full stock one and convert it into an RPK74 with an HPA drum. It would be so much fun to put the *suitcases* up the enemy with the ludicrous noise these things make on full auto.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and the use of session cookies.