Obitwo

There is no barrel bushing on this model

Thats the 10.000 dollar answer

Regarding sloppy slides, take look at this fun clip at: All thes pistols are RS and THAT 1911 has 10x more rattle/wobble/misfit between fram/slide than my Ino even before I fixed mine. I rest my case

My message is that it all depends. I have had and built a couple of upgraded TMs like MEU, M9 etc dressing them up with Alu framed and steel parts but still, the INO wins for me in terms of RS illusion. Even though they are totally "tight" and without play, they still are "Toys" in your hand. The Ino 1911 has passed that border and if one put the same amount of time fiddling with it as you do with a "upgrading kit - project" you can get the ultimate RS 1911 illusion.

Hi, I didn't mean to sound to harsh on you. Your slide's left line is bad as well as the fit of your mainspring housing. This is the core valid point of cristisism towards Ino it think. Why such a bad craftmanship,with diff level of guns? I for my part have a, for my liking to loose frame/slide fit. But most of the issues are fixable and regarding the Q vs RS - I bought some free RS 1911a1 (not Colt branded though) components and the Ino trigger, sight, slidelock etc is much better done. Of course if you compare with a plastic TM there a lot of imperfections but Ino takes the step - from t

Hi, with all respect for those flaws that your gun displays- some similar, some different to mine- I would like to moderate your cristisism abit. Tech wise, we now its a clone and what we pay for are steel parts with the right surface treatment. Here Ino delivers I feel, but unfortunately not regarding the fine tuning/ craftmanship when assembling. Mine flaws are different but Im happy with mine

Yes, If it hadn´t been the rattle, I would have felt that the KJW was the superior one with the steel hammer, sturdier materials and no painted markings which I felt were awful (the fantastic fit between parts on the KSC/KWA should however be mentioned though). There is a very similar KJW upgrade which I have -exact same markings but sadly still with original black trigger + grips (producer called Aplus, on EhobbyA and ASGlobal)

I see that the grips on your Kjw is trademarked with CZ and the trigger is chromed - have you swopped parts with a KSC or have new upgrade parts come out, where to buy? Also, did your Kjw have any barrel wobble when bought?

Here is where the slide bar SHOULD be resting when barrel is locked position

Thanks, but the KWA cz75 barrel is deadtight and has movement smooth like butter, and my Guarder upgraded m9 and MEU has also no rattle. ( Some rattle between slide and frame on a classic 1911 I can live with but not between barrel and slide.) This is the worst experienced so far. But I have found the CAUSE!! Inside the slide (on the left wall/side) there is a bar that pushes the barrel forward into locked position. It is 1mm too far back to lock properly to fix the barrel (or to put it differently; the barrel left side notch that takes it is 1mm to far front - depends on how you see it).

I have now installed the RaTech steel barrel, however the outer barrel wobble is just as bad as earlier. Does anyone recognize this and have a solution? REALLY irritating on a otherwise very nice gun

That was quick will try direct. Thanks a lot

Hi Just bought the Ratech steel barrel but now I can't figure out how to separate inner & outer barrel. Anybody knows how to? - Help appreciated!

I have both and yes there is a difference in feel and "character" but the kjw is made of aluminium vs ksc/kwa:s soft magnesium, so for my part the kjw wins - and the trades are really great. After some lubrication the mechanism is also quite smooth, ok not as smooth as ksc/kwa but ok. The painted trades on my ksc/kwa are embarrasing and it double fires far to much for any one to argue that ksc/kwa has higher quality. Also, the rougher brushed aluminium outerbarrel with its deep trades is more realistic looking than my RATech chromed steel one. One thing though, the barrel sits perfectly tight

Well, its quite funny. My initial reaction when I got mine was little bit the same. "Sh**t what have I spent 900bucks on?". I was then focusing on the ( for me new experience of ) play between slide and frame. But then, after a while it it grew on me. After disassembling, lubing, polishing and some adjusting of trigger so it's tight & with out play and shooting a couple of mags I'm more than happy with it. Comparing to RS And other AS guns I think it's exactly as it should be for that money. It' is not supposed to resemble a modern civilian gun like Kimber, the play between slide and frame