Isamu Posted November 23, 2012 Report Share Posted November 23, 2012 who cares mate? 24h working non stop at max power, a regular ACM optic would have drank 3 batteries already at half the power. I think its pretty worth the money Offtopic: Im watching top gear and reading my own words with jeremy clacksons and James may voice =S what the *fruitcage??? Link to post Share on other sites
ollie_ty Posted November 24, 2012 Report Share Posted November 24, 2012 Another day goes by, and Id still be happy to use this in dim CQB scenarios. Link to post Share on other sites
ollie_ty Posted November 26, 2012 Report Share Posted November 26, 2012 Yesterday, at mid day, the optic switched off. I'd say the performance was pretty good for a clone optic! Link to post Share on other sites
HardcoreCook Posted December 20, 2012 Report Share Posted December 20, 2012 Well I'm glad you like it. Do you have another optic that you can compare it to? Link to post Share on other sites
ollie_ty Posted December 22, 2012 Report Share Posted December 22, 2012 Compared to a standard M2 style aimpoint clone, the dot is much sharper, and the glass is better quality. Link to post Share on other sites
IBMedic Posted January 3, 2013 Report Share Posted January 3, 2013 On an AEG you can get away with most of the clone sights. But WE GBBR have strong recoil. Clone EOtech are usually the weakest. They turn themselves off under recoil or lose their zero. T-1 replicas are slightly better but have that blue tinted glass and poor parallax correction. The comp M2 clones are usually the best. If you can spare the extra buck and live in the US, then just get a low end civilian model real steel optic. Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.