Jump to content


Regular Poster
  • Content Count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

About Zombie00

  • Rank
    Regular Poster

Additional Information

  • Airsofter since
  • Country
  1. I've been doing some research on both ??? 9x39 russian guns (VSS, AS val and SR3/M) and CTO (????????????? ??????????? ??????), the original developers of the Airsoft VSS (they make al the same models as ??? with the addition of the VSK-94). ??? is slightly more expensive than CTO, but they seem to be better prepared to deal with foreign orders. Also, based on awkwardly translated Russian forums, ??? seems to have the upper hand in terms of overall quality and construction. I've been also making lots of comparisons between the Real steel version and what ??? is offering and I'd say they are
  2. There is somewhat of an Airsoft copy made in Russia by some exclusive custom workshop, the price wasn't bad at all for what I recal.
  3. Does anyone here knows if VFC receiver is compatible with LCT front-set? I want a steel barrel on a VFC Ak74 and that seems to be the best way to get there.
  4. Fact: Weight at the front is more wearing on the muscles than weight on the centre or the back of the gun. Not a matter of personal preference here. There are side-mounts for the ak that weight 150 grams, the real Ultimak gas tube 450 grams, so the weight added is roughly the same (with the already mentioned difference in the position and how it affects balance). A good side-mount let's you do a 1/3 co-witness too.
  5. Good parts from the Ar platform? Like what? Only the rear-sight closer to the shooter (more comfortable, yes and better sight radius, sort of irrelevant for airsoft and not meant to be in the Ak from it's very conception, I'd dare to say shorter sight radius is better for airsoft) and ambidextrous fire selector (the fire selector in the ak is awkward, but I always play on full auto anyway). Maybe the grip, but that's a personal preference. The stock? You can get NATO lenght side-folding stocks if you don't like the Warsaw pact length, a collapsible stock isn't THAT much of an improvement, you
  6. hwagan, ShinSeiki, stop being nice to each other already, this is the internet for god sake! This one would have been a better example http://t2.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcTupa9DYtDkY5bWSbpBioqzwZ7CjCAyhvejnJdx768KExyYh9PbgVC1BmJrUA Funny looking abomination
  7. I always laugh to tears with adadqgg (even the nickname is annoying) and the reactions his comments provoque. The vast majority of the forum ends up doing exactly what they accuse him of doing, let his comment be man, he is entitled to give his opinion about any subject as long as he's respectful. The tactical ak is a complicated matter. IMO it has to be done right to look good Here a good example The upper rail is unnecessary, but I believe that you can't buy those separately, so it's ok. Here is a bad example (in hands of a russian FSB) I really don't know what is wrong
  8. I was hoping for something more like RS/VFC quality, not an ok gun. I've seen the King arms version and Ok is the best way to describe it, it isn't bad at all (maybe the plastic parts), but it fails to impress and the materials used seem rather cheap.
  9. That's *fruitcage* hilarious! I love the fal (any version), just wish there was a really good quality version of it. How bad is the STAR/Ares version? I heard the externals were the best of all, but how bad is it internally?
  10. 50 miles? Just a monolithic rail on top and rail on lower hand-guard (there will be a railess version of that part). The rail on top is for the optics (they are moving away from side-rail system), the rail on the lower half of the hand-guard can be removed or used for a VFG or some illumination device and I'm not completely sure if that thing on the gas block is a rail and even if it is I really don't think It will be adding much on the overall weight of the gun, so it doesn't really matter. All this modifications have the goal of making a more adaptable gun so it can sell better on other ma
  11. My somewhat recently bought LCT Ak-105 came with a black polymer grip and it's quite flimsy, has a lot of side-to-side play. It gets better when properly adjusted, but it will loose up over time, most annoying. Besides that I don't have much to complain. I wanted to try with some other grip, what brand do you guys recommend?
  12. Once you install a side-rail on it. No Real Sword Type 56 comes with side-rail. You could get a Kobra for weaver, but that would be the same for any gun, even the other Ak variants. Not sure if you can put it in a SVD, that's the only Real Sword with side-rail.
  13. I just wish there was a decent version of the Fal, they all seem to fail at some (many?) aspects. Awesome camo Zmarre, I don't see that pattern very often, kind of an oddity. The whole picture looks very good too.
  14. Well, I have the same "issue" with my LCT. The hop slider moves around too easily. I've the bad custom of pulling the charging handle when I'm on patrol far from the action and the fake bolt slightly touching the slider was enough to move it. A sort of related question: Have anyone tried putting a Prowin hop-up unit in an LCT Ak? mine is a 104NV if that makes any difference.
  15. I usually enjoy watching your creations, but that's just wrong. I say we should ban you from ever owning an ak again. Just kidding, but that's really disturbing.
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and the use of session cookies.