sadigh

That’s the safety, the mag release is on the trigger guard similar to the USP. What’s the mag and nozzle look like, any chance of some more detailed pics of those? From the stock images I’ve seen online, the nozzle and magazine gas route looks strikingly similar to the KSC/KWA G and ATP series

Tiredness I guess? Thought about something else, the TM mag has a long siphon tube attached to the inlet valve from bada bings magazine video. I wonder, is it possible to remove or cut this off to allow more liquid propellant in the magazine?

Nugent, are you sure about your calculation on the TM mag capacity? By the numbers you posted it holds 8 grams not 12...

At the price point after cyber*insert nasty words here* have demanded they should have more profits due to their licensing gustappo it should be made from titanium. Nethertheless, bad design and functionality can't always be remedied by chucking steel or another better material choice into the mix. I've been watching this thread for some time, have to say the FNX looks superb - such a shame on its internals, more specifically, the ridiculous tolerances to get it to function.

Good point, would be easier to replace an o ring too since they are generally more readily avaliable. I wonder if a pistol (1911 or similar) piston lid kit would fit on the KJW bolt, may have to get one to test. Top effort Raven1, sounds like the KJW is the GBB of choice, will order one soon and post up reports as you have done soon!

Thing is, its a cup for a reason. Its there to form a seal in only one direction, that is, in direction towards the cup. This is for when the gas to expands, it puts pressure against the cup causing it to expand to form a tight seal. This aids efficiency on sending the bolt carrier group into the buffer tube shot after shot. Probably one of the reasons why this gun is so efficient on gas, since not alot is 'lost' from leaks in the system, where gas can escape.

I agree with you Luis21, you're right that they are both different design mags with different dimensions for two seperate systems, and therefore, the general rule of thumb is that they are incompatiable. But, take a look at this - Similar, eh? This is really beginnng to arouse my interest. Just done a mock up in PS, notice that the mags are VERY similar in terms of dimenions of the bb lips and rubber seal in relation to the hole for the mag catch on both mags, meaning that, in theory, everything lines up... Maybe, just maybe, airsoft world are correct, and the

Just noticed that airsoft world (aka airsoft scotland) now stock the AGM mags, and their description states that they are also compatiable with the WE M4 http://www.airsoftworld.net/front-page-pro...e0aedc8668a8cba Now, normally airsoft world are pretty accurate and offer no BS descriptions of their products, but this makes me raise an eyebrow. Is what they say true? I know full well that they are two different systems with propriortory mags. but.... ...this has sparked my curiosoty. Has anyone tried this, or is able to try/confirm this?

It still lives! Very, very nice! Glad to see you've still got it mate

MDK, does your upper receiver have any wobble? It could be that the mag rubber isn't matching up with the underside of the bolt/nozzle properly.

Any AEG compatiable hop rubber won't be compatiable with this unit. The supplied one keeps the barrel in place and centred, plus the front of the supplied one is longer. It also acts as the feed ramp for the bb's and is made to mate with the nozzle.

WGC chrono the gun using 134a. Thats why its reading 350fps.

No problem skyflash t0fudelivery, I've tried to answer your questions as best as I can - The only differences between the regular and 'delta' versions are - - Colour of mag is different, function remains the same. Delta mags are darker. There are 3 mags avaliable for the WA, two are the same in function, just different colours (as mentioned above). The third is the cheapest option, its the 'S' type mag which lacks the fuction for the bolt-stop to work when the mag is empty. - Delta version has regular handguard and a 'chopped carry handle' style BUIS. Regular has RIS and

They are incompatiable. The G&P receiver is the same as the WA dimensions, the inokatsu receiver is longer, true to RS dimensions.

More stuff for the WA m4, kits made by Inokatsu. Prices are on the posters, frankly I think at those prices, Inokatsu can go f**k themselves, especially looking at those trademarks on the lower receiver- ridiculously overpriced