Shao14

what's the proper angle? Do you have a picture? S&W don't make this kind of grip anymore, and I have no reference (all the places showing the medallions on the box AND manual were cut out).

Sorry to hear that. Luckily, mine are OK, there's no glue or anything, but still pretty tight, and I had punch them from the inside. I don't know why this did occur to me earlier that they were flipped. Man, I feel dumb now.

Those can be flipped over?!#$ I thought WGC permanently erased them. *goes to try* Power and accuracy? Haha, details in review are coming when I have sometime.

Y'all may call me chief now.

No, of course you wouldn't be penalized for being derogatory towards female dogs. You'd be penalized for saying the lord's name in vain. But seriously, if you don't like to get neg points for saying the word "gay", just don't say it anymore. And it's fair game for others to neg rep you for any other curse word you say that's not catched by the word filter.

But your way might introduce too many pinned threads on top of the tech section, and make people hard to browse other tech info. Or, we can combine both our ways: make a sub-section for take down guides, and pin the good ones on top of the sub-section.

Or, we can just have a sub-section in the Tech section for take down guides.

You could also email Arnie or R22 to add it in the Article Section.

Maybe he's worried about the "if" part.

How many stand alone take down guides have people written here? There's simply not enough demand to make a special section for it. Most people who write reviews would also include a brief take down procedure in the review.

How about we worry about that problem when we have 300 reviews for the G36c in the database? If each section in a review is clearly labeled, it wouldn't be so hard to find the take down section if there's one, is it? Furthermore, there's a search button for the review database as well.

Here's a better idea: why don't the authors just include a section in each gun review on how to take down/field strip the gun if they could?

nope.

I'd just like to add that if anyone finds his/her signature is missing, then it's because it was breaking the sig rules, and he/she should not try to restore the old sig, nor should he/she try to complain to any mod. You will face serious consequences if you repeatedly violate the signature rule (or just being bitchy about your sigs).

Wait till you buy a CA M249.

No, it's not ok to "re-post" anything. If you feel strongly that a thread's title should be changed, feel free to write a petition to any of the mods explaining your reasons and the new purposed title, and a we'll consider changing the title.

Could this be a browser issue if there's no technical reason for it.

I think the Canadian price on everything is more expensive. Here in the US, they all cost a bit less (like 50% less ), at least Froogle told me so.

Man, your camera don't do your glock justice. I can sell you my Canon A300 for $100.

Precisely.

I don't know what camera you got, but a lot of time when you are not using flash under insufficient light, you might think you are holding the camera steady enough, but you'll be surprised if you just set the camera down somewhere and make it totally still when the timer goes off. When I take my picture, with my three years old Canon A300, indoors, I'd set it to manual without flash, and if it's during daylight but without direct sun light, I'd set it to the "cloudy" setting, and if it's at night under my lamp, I'd set it to the "incandescent light" setting, both of which have longer shut

Dave, a tip on taking pictures, use a tripod, or put your camera down on a stationary place, and set the timer so the instance your finger pushing the button doesn't disturb the camera, and those photos will look much clearer (not that they are not clear now, but you'll just get even better. ).

Me joining the .357 crowd.