SuperCQB Posted May 30, 2008 Report Share Posted May 30, 2008 I didn't see a topic about it, so if it is a duplicate, I apologize. Classic Army RPK-7 Version features: # Steel Made Bipod # High Performance Motor # Metal Outer Barrel and Frame # Wooden Hand Guard and Stock # Reinforced Gear Set and Cylinder # 7mm Oily Metal Bearing Gear Box # Bearing Spring Guide and Piston Head # Real Gun Logo with Unique Serial Number # Includes electric Drum Magazine Classic Army RPK Link to post Share on other sites
Magsz Posted May 30, 2008 Report Share Posted May 30, 2008 You left one feature out. "Mechbox Explodes right out of the box" The sample that i received broke within 250 rounds. Blown spur gear bearing, stripped sector and spur gears. Piston head detached from the piston due to lack of locktite causeing massive failure in the gearbox. How hard is it to locktite your piston heads CA, come on now... The good news is that after the gun was repaired it can fire off entire box mags with zero and i mean ZERO slowdown from the motor provided your battery can handle the sustained discharge current required. Link to post Share on other sites
SuperCQB Posted May 30, 2008 Author Report Share Posted May 30, 2008 Well, I wasn't planning on getting one...but that doesn't sound good. Link to post Share on other sites
MotoSam Posted May 30, 2008 Report Share Posted May 30, 2008 If i sellotaped a false belt of ammo to an m4 is it a stoner lmg? No. RPK my *albatross*, ak47 with long barrel, bipod and wood, nothing else. It doesnt have an rpk receiver, which is very different to a milled ak receiver, and it has a standard ak rear sight. What a waste of time. Link to post Share on other sites
judgeman Posted May 30, 2008 Report Share Posted May 30, 2008 Yea, sorry. Looks like ######. I think i'll pass. Link to post Share on other sites
ReDgUaRd008 Posted May 30, 2008 Report Share Posted May 30, 2008 Well it is pretty much correct since CA is using a copy of ARSENAL INC's copy of the RPK-47. ARSENAL RPK-7 has a Milled receiver. But CA didn't even copy it right using a RPK-47 stock. Link to post Share on other sites
dookieboy Posted May 30, 2008 Report Share Posted May 30, 2008 Yes, a sh*** gun from a sh*** place... *just what we wanted...* edit: Dang it didn't edit out when I said Sh** lol Link to post Share on other sites
my_plague_666 Posted May 30, 2008 Report Share Posted May 30, 2008 CA AKs am fail! start making proper kalashnikov replicas CA, and make the ones that are already near enough correct comparable to VFC (feature and quality wise)... then i might consider buying one of your AKs Link to post Share on other sites
Fin Posted May 30, 2008 Report Share Posted May 30, 2008 Dear classic army Due to this recent failure of yours we are putting your brand (even further) below the clone brands in our list of best gun manufactures Signed The BLF (Bord of licensing failures) Link to post Share on other sites
MotoSam Posted May 31, 2008 Report Share Posted May 31, 2008 Well it is pretty much correct since CA is using a copy of ARSENAL INC's copy of the RPK-47. ARSENAL RPK-7 has a Milled receiver. But CA didn't even copy it right using a RPK-47 stock. And they picked that gun, not used by any army and made on the cheap for undiscerning buyers from rubbish, because its easier to make an aeg from existing parts, ak47 parts. God forbid they should model from scratch the correct receiver of a military rpk. Not as bad as JG's "dragunov" but a very poor show from CA, incredibly lazy. Buy the full steel RMW model that is correct, for the love of god. Link to post Share on other sites
Revenge Seeker Posted May 31, 2008 Report Share Posted May 31, 2008 CA AKs am fail! I approve this message. Link to post Share on other sites
Abelius Posted May 31, 2008 Report Share Posted May 31, 2008 I always get this strange feeling inside me when CA advertises their "high performance motor." The feeling is called total lol phail. And the gun is awful too. Link to post Share on other sites
my_plague_666 Posted May 31, 2008 Report Share Posted May 31, 2008 And they picked that gun, not used by any army and made on the cheap for undiscerning buyers from rubbish, because its easier to make an aeg from existing parts, ak47 parts. heres the ironic bit, CA hadnt made a milled reciever before, therefore they had to go to the effort of making a new reciever anyway. WHY DIDNT THEY JUST DO IT PROPERLY??? Link to post Share on other sites
The_Boy_Swift Posted May 31, 2008 Report Share Posted May 31, 2008 Yeah they did, years ago. Den have them for $67 Link to post Share on other sites
MotoSam Posted May 31, 2008 Report Share Posted May 31, 2008 heres the ironic bit, CA hadnt made a milled reciever before, therefore they had to go to the effort of making a new reciever anyway. WHY DIDNT THEY JUST DO IT PROPERLY??? *facepalm* CA fail, so bad it makes me feel like I've failed in some way. So our retailers here have discontinued the sportsline too, they kept being returned due to gearbox failure. Theres that word again. RMW rpk for the win. Link to post Share on other sites
Fin Posted May 31, 2008 Report Share Posted May 31, 2008 So our retailers here have discontinued the sportsline too, they kept being returned due to gearbox failure. Theres that word again. That makes me laugh, they make the sportline to compete with the clones and go and make a set of guns that are even worse Link to post Share on other sites
Hairy Potter Posted June 1, 2008 Report Share Posted June 1, 2008 Blech! I'd rather take a D-Boys placed in RPK body. Link to post Share on other sites
liquidflorian Posted June 1, 2008 Report Share Posted June 1, 2008 The one I had a chance to use wasn't all that bad. It is made out of really soft crappy metals though, and the front sight aperture cracked off just being inside the case we had it in. The real let down is the new motorized drum mag. It's garbage. We had two and neither of them would work for any length of time. Not to mention it won't fit MAG RPK magazines. This had so much potential too.... Link to post Share on other sites
my_plague_666 Posted June 1, 2008 Report Share Posted June 1, 2008 This had so much potential too.... no it didnt. it was a CA AK, it was doomed to mediocrity from the outset Link to post Share on other sites
liquidflorian Posted June 1, 2008 Report Share Posted June 1, 2008 no it didnt. it was a CA AK, it was doomed to mediocrity from the outset Yeah, I guess I'm reading into "not being a complete failure" as "potential"... Link to post Share on other sites
Revenge Seeker Posted June 1, 2008 Report Share Posted June 1, 2008 Blech! I'd rather take a D-Boys placed in RPK body. You make it seem like Dboys are really inaccurate. Link to post Share on other sites
Pero_Buffalo Posted February 21, 2009 Report Share Posted February 21, 2009 Who knows where can I buy spare muzzle with foresight?)) I dropped this toy on the floor and this detail has been broken. Same parts from Marui AK or compatible do not fit to fat outer barrel of this toy. Link to post Share on other sites
liquidflorian Posted February 22, 2009 Report Share Posted February 22, 2009 Who knows where can I buy spare muzzle with foresight?)) I dropped this toy on the floor and this detail has been broken. Same parts from Marui AK or compatible do not fit to fat outer barrel of this toy. Dude, that happened with ours when we were trying to get the muzzle break off. Exactly the same kind of break. Sense you're in Russia I would try and fit a real front site on it. might as well right? You know, I have to revise my position on this gun. It shoots like a *fruitcage* ing champ, just everything forward of the hand guard is sketchy. RHP has put probably put +80,000 rounds through ours and it's been solid. Good hop up too. Link to post Share on other sites
H-A-C Posted March 1, 2009 Report Share Posted March 1, 2009 Anyone know how to do the modification to get other drum mags to fit? Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.