Jump to content

VFC to make a PTS AEG


fiddlesticks4220

Recommended Posts

VFC seems to make a PTS M4 with their own metal body its on wgc shop

 

(attention mods this is news and is a new gun made by a manufacturer and it has not been posted on the news section their for it IS news PLEASE do not raise my warn level again for trying to share news!)

 

http://www.wgcshop.com/pcart/shopper.php?i...EG-MOEWS_srch_1

 

Just thought id let yall know.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I wonder it comes with blowback. If not, I'll be buying myself one next month.

 

All it needs is an EOTech 553 sight, a set of Magpul MOE handguard rails, and a decent one-point sling.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Is that not just the standard magpul reciever with a VFC gearbox in it ?

 

Edit*

 

I assume it it appears to be WGC version of the Redwolf one, they both have the same receivers, handguards grips etc, the difference lies bewteen the internals. (i guess )

Link to post
Share on other sites
Is that not just the standard magpul reciever with a VFC gearbox in it ?

 

They're not the same. The Magpul PTS version for example has grooves on the front of the magwel, and an integrated trigger guard. The VFC receiver has a removable/foldable trigger guard, and no grooves. This could be a Magpul receiver made by VFC.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, VFC makes extremely good externals, and tend to have an almost fetishist devotion to detail. if this partnership between Magpul and VFC continues onto the Masada/ACR...

 

It'll likely take at least another year, but it's going to be the most rediculously awesome AEG ever. Given than anyone but highcap users still work with AEGs

Link to post
Share on other sites

Because VFC has a reputation of making accurate, reliable equipment that's usable right out of the box. I have no intention of purchasing a piece of untested equipment that could become nothing more than a giant paperweight after a day's worth of use. The small price I pay is that the VFC version isn't 100% accurate. But then again, I'm no longer the purist I used to be.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and the use of session cookies.