alundiel Posted September 11, 2006 Report Share Posted September 11, 2006 Im still out to get him back for that... suggestions anyone? <{POST_SNAPBACK}> i would have given him my entire box mag from my m249... but that is just me most of the guys i play with are good about stopping ...er.. sometime close to when you say out Link to post Share on other sites
Pablo Posted September 11, 2006 Report Share Posted September 11, 2006 NOTE: to all you who will presumably neg me for this (samm), i welcome it. I intend to get banned from this forum as i spend most of my free time here, and that's a problem. The only way to make sure i am gone is to ban me, so i will go out with a bang. The only thing i really care about here is how bih this thread gets, being the inly thing i've actually contributed to this forum. When i am gone, someone keep me updated. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> You only have to ask. Of course, if you were to physically attack someone at my local skirmish site you'd find yourself in the back of a police van on an assault charge. Of course there is the possibility that it could be an ambulance, it really depends how the other players react. Link to post Share on other sites
ronburgundy__ Posted September 11, 2006 Report Share Posted September 11, 2006 If someone emptied an ENTIRE hicap into you, your telling me you wouldnt possibly smack the guy around? Granted I'm like 5'5", so I wouldnt do much smacking, but I would definatley consider it. 300rnds at point blank? Link to post Share on other sites
Pablo Posted September 11, 2006 Report Share Posted September 11, 2006 Nope. I have a 5000 round boxmag. I'd also shake his hand and commend him on his bravery. Link to post Share on other sites
ronburgundy__ Posted September 11, 2006 Report Share Posted September 11, 2006 hahhhhahahha I got to get around to making one of those boxmags, any day now... Link to post Share on other sites
Samm Posted September 12, 2006 Report Share Posted September 12, 2006 Something else on this forum that really gets me-the rep system. Primarily because somebody will incorporate a grudge into a rep point. If someone doesn't like someone else, person1 will neg rep them for the first slightly out of line thing they do (i.e. correcting someone's grammar even when the rest of the post is helpful). See that samm? Get a clue. Even though i'm not top dog when it comes to shotguns i still know a few things about which ones are good, so stop neg repping me 6 times an hour, okay? Personal rant over. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA Get a grip and stop dropping the drama bomb. If you count the +ve I gave you back, I've -ve repped ONCE You were going out of your way to berate the guy. You can't deny it. Link to post Share on other sites
alundiel Posted September 12, 2006 Report Share Posted September 12, 2006 begun, the rep war has.... *insert picture of yoda here* Link to post Share on other sites
Hauk Posted September 12, 2006 Report Share Posted September 12, 2006 I'll help you out here! Link to post Share on other sites
Jagdraben Posted September 12, 2006 Report Share Posted September 12, 2006 Cue Imperial March. Link to post Share on other sites
Pablo Posted September 12, 2006 Report Share Posted September 12, 2006 Wandering a little off topic there, people. Link to post Share on other sites
pillow_pwnage Posted September 12, 2006 Report Share Posted September 12, 2006 Know what really grinds my gears? Mods who warn people for straying off topic. Link to post Share on other sites
Sclass12 Posted September 12, 2006 Report Share Posted September 12, 2006 Okay, got to post something here. I'm getting so incredibly annoyed by the term 'flash hider' - I want to punch people every time I hear/see it, and keep punching them until they stop moving. Just where did this come from anyway? Do you people know ANYTHING about firearms? It's a flash EXCLUDER, or OCCLUDER. Not a hider, eliminator, suppressor (that's something else entirely) or whatever. The reason for this is simple - the thing on the front of the barrel does not hide or eliminate the muzzle flash. It simply directs it away from the view of the firer, so as to avoid dazzling him/her/it and ruining night-vision, target view, etc. Now, I can understand that the Hong Kong retailers might have a translation problem with this, and plumped for 'hider' as the nearest term to whatever the Chinese is, but the English Speaking world has no such excuse. It's really hard to sound knowledgable about weapons when you can't even get the basic terms correct, guys. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> My father spent 6 years in the US Army (1964-1970), including a tour of duty in Vietnam (1967-1968) and he calls them 'flash hiders'. But then again, what does he know about firearms? Link to post Share on other sites
pillow_pwnage Posted September 12, 2006 Report Share Posted September 12, 2006 Hardly a valid point, as 99% of LE/Military Personel still call magazines clips. Being enrolled does not make you knowledgable about firearms from a technical standpoint in the least. If you can shoot and kill, they could care less what you call it. But yes, it is a flash hider. It is a flash suppressor. It is a flash disperser. It is a flash occluder. It is a flash excluder. They're all right, get over it. Link to post Share on other sites
alundiel Posted September 12, 2006 Report Share Posted September 12, 2006 what is a magazine clip? *very confused* Link to post Share on other sites
Chrome Beretta Posted September 12, 2006 Report Share Posted September 12, 2006 I think he ment "magazines, clips" Link to post Share on other sites
pillow_pwnage Posted September 12, 2006 Report Share Posted September 12, 2006 Why yes, yes I did. Link to post Share on other sites
Sinner101GR Posted September 12, 2006 Report Share Posted September 12, 2006 Hardly a valid point, as 99% of LE/Military Personel still call magazines clips. 53% of all people make up statistics out of their head to prove a point. Link to post Share on other sites
Jagdraben Posted September 12, 2006 Report Share Posted September 12, 2006 53% of all people make up statistics out of their head to prove a point. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> And 67.3% of all people make up statistics on the spot for no purpose what-so-ever. ® Link to post Share on other sites
pillow_pwnage Posted September 13, 2006 Report Share Posted September 13, 2006 1% Link to post Share on other sites
alundiel Posted September 13, 2006 Report Share Posted September 13, 2006 I dont see the need to make up percentages to seem 'better' Link to post Share on other sites
Sledge Posted September 13, 2006 Report Share Posted September 13, 2006 37% of images are hosted on Imageshack. And that grinds my gears. Along with Linsey Lohan. Link to post Share on other sites
phoenix360mute Posted September 13, 2006 Report Share Posted September 13, 2006 linsey lohan can grind my gears anyday, as long as she's over the age of consent and infection free Link to post Share on other sites
alundiel Posted September 13, 2006 Report Share Posted September 13, 2006 linsey lohan can grind my gears anyday, as long as she's over the age of consent and infection free <{POST_SNAPBACK}> wishful thinking......excuse me while i drift off into a daydream Link to post Share on other sites
phoenix360mute Posted September 13, 2006 Report Share Posted September 13, 2006 lol, wishfull indeed Link to post Share on other sites
pillow_pwnage Posted September 13, 2006 Report Share Posted September 13, 2006 Am I the only one who finds her more repulsive than Condaleeza Rice? Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.