Misfit

You look like a little kid in this one, mate.

I said in two posts that UKSF have worn Multicam... Oh, and UKSF on the left.

Right, lets clear this up. The 417 isn't in active service, in the sense that it hasn't been completely adopted. It's still being trialled. I can only guess where you're getting your information, it sounds like you've been talking to soldiers that have been playing too close to the poppy fields.

Yes. The pictures speak to me and everything. They like tea and biscuits.

I know Multicam is in use, you even quoted me saying it was. Yeah, there are rumours and mutterings that HK416's and 417's are being trialled, but the best bet is to get a L119A1 as they're much more common and have been confirmed. Never ever heard of a MAV being used, you'd probably do better with the BHI Plate carrier or the issue Ops Vest or chest rig.

Yeah, I'm sure the amount of photos I've posted of UKSF and advice is useless. That must be why so many people keep PMing and emailing me for advice. Right. Yeah. You've got me there, it's definitely all junk. Lose the multicam trousers, or go all multicam. Got photos on my site of UKSF wearing Multicam and RAV's. Lose the helmet and googles. Lose the rubbish on the M4, change it into a L119A1. Change the plate carrier. See these for reference: SBS, Afghanistan - http://www.konstipation.com/stuff/walt/sbs/afghan/ SAS, Afghanistan - http://www.konstipat

I thought it was pretty much common sense, seeing as the photo I was replying to was of a M4. M16's weren't even in the discussion, you just posted a photo of something completely irrelevant trying to look clever, and, well, it kind of back fired. So, let me clear this up for you as that bump was obviously more severe than I first thought. M16A1 + 203 = Correct. M16A2 + 203 = Correct. M4 = Wrong. M4 + 203 = Wrong. M4 + UGL = Wrong. L119A1 + 203 = Wrong. L119A1 + UGL = Correct. My post was correct. Yes, it was worded slightly wrong, but that was du

Yes, that's what I said. And, as I had explained, I was specifically speaking about M4's and L119A1's. Admittedly it was worded a bit wrong, but did you even read my reply? Even cats and dogs know that the British military use M16/203's. I'll repeat myself again as obviously you were dropped on the head as a newborn, but I was specifically talking about the M4 and L119A1. The M16/203 thing is completely irrelevant to what I was discussing. Now please, shut up and go be a keyboard warrior tit elsewhere.

I presumed that everyone in this thread would know that the British Military have used M16A1/203's and M16A2/203s. In fact, I've got tons of photos of it on my website. I was just talking about M4s or SFWs, as Ubar said. I wouldn't have told him to get rid of the '203 had he put it on an M16. So er, you just made yourself look like a tit. Take a look at these photos for reference mate: http://www.konstipation.com/stuff/walt/sas/gw1/

Why don't you guys get a team forum? This kind of thread shouldn't be in this section... //Edit: Ah, it's been moved.

Because British forces don't use M203's, or M4's for that matter. Turn it into a L119A1 and slap a UGL on it if you really want a grenade launcher.

Get rid of the M203.

They are. Why do you find this strange?

I was planning on sending this to Leadmill when he was next on IRC, but I may as well post it here too. 470 photos of UK ARU's and AP. http://www.konstipation.com/stuff/walt/ap/

Absolutely awful, you should just give up and cry yourself to sleep.

Why would you start a picture thread and not post pictures?

This isn't exactly gear discussion, is it? :|

Oh really? Tell me when you become a moderator.

Not meaning to ###### on your bonfire, but £135 isn't that great a price to be honest. For a fiver extra, I got a KSC USPc with 2 extra magazines, a hardcase and a holster. But still, congratulations on getting a USP.