spider1982 Posted July 7, 2005 Report Share Posted July 7, 2005 Agrred, but if they shut their eyes how do they know when it's gone? If you are a guy I would iomagine that seeing another blokes hairy *albartroth* crack is enought to put you off of a thong for a very long time lol Link to post Share on other sites
sniper_boi Posted July 7, 2005 Report Share Posted July 7, 2005 breifs well i dno if they can be classed as boxers but there Link to post Share on other sites
Psaldorn Posted July 7, 2005 Author Report Share Posted July 7, 2005 Handily ignoring any gay people Prejudiced if tehy DON'T show it. Rather see a nubile girlies though. Link to post Share on other sites
Jow Posted July 7, 2005 Report Share Posted July 7, 2005 It's not like its showing their ringpiece is it. Not sure why, but this is the funniest thing I have read in a while! Link to post Share on other sites
Psaldorn Posted July 7, 2005 Author Report Share Posted July 7, 2005 breifs well i dno if they can be classed as boxers but there <{POST_SNAPBACK}> I'd class those as "Large" Link to post Share on other sites
spider1982 Posted July 7, 2005 Report Share Posted July 7, 2005 Not ignoring, just choosing not to think about a bloke looking at something liek that and enjoying it. Don't have a problem with gays, but don't personally agree with it Link to post Share on other sites
Psaldorn Posted July 7, 2005 Author Report Share Posted July 7, 2005 Oh does anyone have any pics of the Calvin Klein girls briefs, the 2-tone ones with "Calvin Klein" written around the waist band. They were very plain, just teh material basically. Circa 1999. They looked HOT. A previous ladyfriend used to wear them and she heard NO complaints but I've never seen them anywhere else (but haven't really looked) On another seperate note: I find cK boxers are teh only ones that are fitted to not destroy your ganglion.. most other boxers ride up and crush or simply don't provide space. Mens Pants are suitable only for eunachs. Link to post Share on other sites
Rob15 Posted July 7, 2005 Report Share Posted July 7, 2005 Has to be lacy/frilly panties for me, thankyouverymuch. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> *nods head in agreement* Link to post Share on other sites
Shao14 Posted July 7, 2005 Report Share Posted July 7, 2005 A hormone-fest, thats what <{POST_SNAPBACK}> I'm sure Arnie and the mods will be proud. Link to post Share on other sites
Psaldorn Posted July 7, 2005 Author Report Share Posted July 7, 2005 The lace ones that are on the low-back/high-*albartroth* but don't really go over the *albartroth*.. they are nice, shape it nicely to the touch, but I don't think they do much for the appearance, it's sort of like a bum-hat. Link to post Share on other sites
Psaldorn Posted July 7, 2005 Author Report Share Posted July 7, 2005 Shao - you don't need to read it, nor do the mods. Nothing here breaks the rules (it's not explicit or crude) No more offensive than asking if you prefer girls in one, two or three point slings. Link to post Share on other sites
Shao14 Posted July 7, 2005 Report Share Posted July 7, 2005 Shao - you don't need to read it, nor do the mods. Nothing here breaks the rules (it's not explicit or crude) No more offensive than asking if you prefer girls in one, two or three point slings. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Oh, I'm not reading any of these, and I'm not saying it breaks the rules, and I'm not offended. I just like to spam threads like this. Link to post Share on other sites
cpaxton Posted July 7, 2005 Report Share Posted July 7, 2005 Oh does anyone have any pics of the Calvin Klein girls briefs, the 2-tone ones with "Calvin Klein" written around the waist band. They were very plain, just teh material basically. Circa 1999. They looked HOT. A previous ladyfriend used to wear them and she heard NO complaints but I've never seen them anywhere else (but haven't really looked) On another seperate note: I find cK boxers are teh only ones that are fitted to not destroy your ganglion.. most other boxers ride up and crush or simply don't provide space. Mens Pants are suitable only for eunachs. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Yeah I have a mate(lady!) who was wearing some the other day. Good point about Ck boxers, except i have a *fruitcage* tight pair which really are ###### crushers! Link to post Share on other sites
Jow Posted July 7, 2005 Report Share Posted July 7, 2005 I really don't understand why people continue to label acceptable questions in the off topic forum as spam ... Link to post Share on other sites
cpaxton Posted July 7, 2005 Report Share Posted July 7, 2005 Oh, I'm not reading any of these, and I'm not saying it breaks the rules, and I'm not offended. I just like to spam threads like this. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> sorry to go off topic, but how do you set which group you are in?? Link to post Share on other sites
Ghost_Rider Posted July 7, 2005 Report Share Posted July 7, 2005 sorry to go off topic, but how do you set which group you are in?? <{POST_SNAPBACK}> You can't. It's denoted by the number of posts you make. The only time you can change it is by making a donation, which will make you an Arnoholic Link to post Share on other sites
Psaldorn Posted July 7, 2005 Author Report Share Posted July 7, 2005 Cpaxton: Any chance of getting some sort of picture or serial number? Or both Link to post Share on other sites
Jow Posted July 7, 2005 Report Share Posted July 7, 2005 You don't set it. Link to post Share on other sites
cpaxton Posted July 7, 2005 Report Share Posted July 7, 2005 Cpaxton: Any chance of getting some sort of picture or serial number? Or both <{POST_SNAPBACK}> lol yeah, her boyfriend may object though! Link to post Share on other sites
Psaldorn Posted July 7, 2005 Author Report Share Posted July 7, 2005 I'll take full responsibility. It's all in the name of positively IDing them. Obviously Any quarrel over pictures can be sorted out by a quick clubbing of manhoods on a table like an animals mating dance. Seems to sort out most Female-based disagreements. Edit: How did YOU see them then eh? Link to post Share on other sites
pace Posted July 7, 2005 Report Share Posted July 7, 2005 you boy's need to grow up, discover the naughtiness of french underwear perticually with stockings instead of tights, then it works! Link to post Share on other sites
cpaxton Posted July 7, 2005 Report Share Posted July 7, 2005 I'll take full responsibility. It's all in the name of positively IDing them. Obviously Any quarrel over pictures can be sorted out by a quick clubbing of manhoods on a table like an animals mating dance. Seems to sort out most Female-based disagreements. Edit: How did YOU see them then eh? <{POST_SNAPBACK}> low cut trousers, and a keen eye. Link to post Share on other sites
Psaldorn Posted July 7, 2005 Author Report Share Posted July 7, 2005 That's more front/legs.. were focused on the back-bumpers here. Link to post Share on other sites
Psaldorn Posted July 7, 2005 Author Report Share Posted July 7, 2005 Another reason I like punk music. The girls like wearing baggy trousers which fall down. But since being dumped I've been stuck at my Mum's house and I'm too poor to go out anywy BTW cpaxton.. you didn't use smilies when promising piccies.. so I presume you're serious? Make it your mission son! All the new cK pants are a bit rubbish looking imho. Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.