sillyp Posted January 12, 2006 Report Share Posted January 12, 2006 Wait, so is the Sun a legitimate paper, or another tabloid that makes stuff up? Because Id rather read your tabloids than our idiotic American ones. At least they try to make it sound realistic. That is, if it is a tabloid. Link to post Share on other sites
oikoik Posted January 12, 2006 Report Share Posted January 12, 2006 it is a tabloid. with tits in it on page 3. breasts. mammaries. nipples. moist. stw. tissue. Link to post Share on other sites
sillyp Posted January 12, 2006 Report Share Posted January 12, 2006 it is a tabloid. with tits in it on page 3. breasts. mammaries. nipples. moist. stw. tissue. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Uh huh...well, Ill have to get one of these 'Sun' tabloids, to, erm, compare to, uh, American ones... Link to post Share on other sites
oikoik Posted January 12, 2006 Report Share Posted January 12, 2006 Uh huh...well, Ill have to get one of these 'Sun' tabloids, to, erm, compare to, uh, American ones... <{POST_SNAPBACK}> the sun gives its page 3 section its own website: http://www.page3.co.uk/ i think you might be able to get an idea.. keeleys a major favourite btw Link to post Share on other sites
doc_newstead Posted January 12, 2006 Report Share Posted January 12, 2006 Wait, so is the Sun a legitimate paper, or another tabloid that makes stuff up? <{POST_SNAPBACK}> It's the most widely-read English language newspaper in the world. So the fact that it's so full of homophobic, self-righteous rubbish is even more depressing. Link to post Share on other sites
CountDoom Posted January 13, 2006 Report Share Posted January 13, 2006 *Smacks Forhead* *Looks happy as he remembers America's favorite tabloid* Link to post Share on other sites
bigphish038 Posted January 13, 2006 Report Share Posted January 13, 2006 All I have to say is.. One reason why the U.S. Forces will always be superior.. Link to post Share on other sites
Sledge Posted January 13, 2006 Report Share Posted January 13, 2006 Because their commander-in-chief is an illiterate drunk? Link to post Share on other sites
doc_newstead Posted January 13, 2006 Report Share Posted January 13, 2006 Because you have right on your side? Or Murdoch? I'm confused. You know who owns Fox don't you? Link to post Share on other sites
Sledge Posted January 13, 2006 Report Share Posted January 13, 2006 I can't quite see his line of reasoning. "Here is an American getting twatted with a baseball. And THAT'S why our army is better!" It's... interesting, but it's not immediately obvious how it works. Link to post Share on other sites
Gene Posted January 13, 2006 Report Share Posted January 13, 2006 I think it's because Americans are allowed to leech pictures, yet the British are not. Link to post Share on other sites
Sledge Posted January 13, 2006 Report Share Posted January 13, 2006 Is this going to lead to another website getting shirty with someone nicking their bandwidth? Link to post Share on other sites
joeking27 Posted January 13, 2006 Report Share Posted January 13, 2006 Is this going to lead to another website getting shirty with someone nicking their bandwidth? <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Who cares? The US is best country in the world! Link to post Share on other sites
blanksight Posted January 13, 2006 Report Share Posted January 13, 2006 well of course the us army is SUPERIOR but OUR army has MANNERS! very rude to attack at dawn you know... Link to post Share on other sites
Dithindious Posted January 13, 2006 Report Share Posted January 13, 2006 Whos army wouldn't be better than most others when they have a budget of over $300 billion . USA $370.7 billion in 2003 BEFORE the "war on terrorism" UK $42,836.5 million in 2003 Before Tony Blair copied Bush on his anti terrorism thing So thats probably about 30 Billion more for us and about 20 million more for UK all figure in ESTIMATED dollars for comparison taken from some world factbook. although 42 mill sounds bit low probably more like 70 but don't hold me to that. Back on topic oh wait no ones on topic I wouldn't be trusting anything coming from a tabloid no matter what country it is Britain or America they all talk *beep*. The press make all its money by harassing people and twisting there words, the only good thing about them has already been linked by oikoik Link to post Share on other sites
doc_newstead Posted January 13, 2006 Report Share Posted January 13, 2006 Whos army wouldn't be better than most others when they have a budget of over $300 billion <{POST_SNAPBACK}> The Iraqis? Link to post Share on other sites
Lance Jackass Posted January 13, 2006 Report Share Posted January 13, 2006 I also do parties..... Link to post Share on other sites
Dithindious Posted January 13, 2006 Report Share Posted January 13, 2006 The Iraqis? <{POST_SNAPBACK}> They might be able to get some proper guns though, sticks don't do much to a bunch of snipers standing 400+m away but they could always try. Wait what am i talking about, Iraqis had an army Link to post Share on other sites
SPG Posted January 13, 2006 Report Share Posted January 13, 2006 Maybe he means the US Army is better because it's full of people willing to be hit on the head with baseballs, and whose heads are so empty that they don't notice? So the US has more cannon fodder than the UK? *Sits back and waits for the cheese eating surrender monkey comments* Link to post Share on other sites
oikoik Posted January 13, 2006 Report Share Posted January 13, 2006 Wait what am i talking about, Iraqis had an armythey did, but that was 1991... Link to post Share on other sites
doc_newstead Posted January 13, 2006 Report Share Posted January 13, 2006 Maybe he means the US Army is better because it's full of people willing to be hit on the head with baseballs, and whose heads are so empty that they don't notice? So the US has more cannon fodder than the UK? *Sits back and waits for the cheese eating surrender monkey comments* <{POST_SNAPBACK}> I'd be more prepared for neg reps, abusive PM's and possibly a warning point Link to post Share on other sites
Hillslam Posted January 13, 2006 Report Share Posted January 13, 2006 Can we get back on topic? Finding some pics of the chick!?!? This her? Link to post Share on other sites
doc_newstead Posted January 13, 2006 Report Share Posted January 13, 2006 Er, several large clues point to 'No'. Link to post Share on other sites
DarkLite Posted January 13, 2006 Report Share Posted January 13, 2006 Whilst I point to north. Link to post Share on other sites
Hillslam Posted January 13, 2006 Report Share Posted January 13, 2006 Er, several large clues point to 'No'. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> I know its not - I'm trying to jumpstart the dead animal. Here in this thread we have a perfectly good excuse to post scads of pics of babes n guns, but nooooooo... Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.