kenxin Posted February 14, 2014 Report Share Posted February 14, 2014 well first of all the Inokatsu isn't even out even if it was, inokatsu doesn't design their own stuff. they just copy internals from other manufacturers. Cybergun bought/absorbed/assimilated borg style Ino a while ago. I made that remark because ino wanted to release a FNP like 2 aeons ago and probably had some sort of design in place and cybergun may be using that to produce this. Link to post Share on other sites
aznriptide859 Posted February 14, 2014 Report Share Posted February 14, 2014 Few more pics courtesy of Popular Airsoft's feed: http://instagram.com/p/kYxSphDfr1/ http://instagram.com/p/kYxf0UjfsD/ Link to post Share on other sites
FireKnife Posted February 14, 2014 Report Share Posted February 14, 2014 Hopefully they make mags without the huge bumper as well. those just seem *too* big for any practical use. This, what is it with sticking huge bloody bumbers on pistol magazines, just makes them harder to manipulate into pouches etc. Still interesting to see a new design. 'FireKnife' Link to post Share on other sites
scorch Posted February 14, 2014 Report Share Posted February 14, 2014 It's really happening? Really? Like, for real? Commence fapping. Link to post Share on other sites
NonEx Posted February 14, 2014 Report Share Posted February 14, 2014 This, what is it with sticking huge bloody bumbers on pistol magazines, just makes them harder to manipulate into pouches etc. Still interesting to see a new design. 'FireKnife' ? Was answered above, it's a +1 bumper (RS style). And doesn't a bigger baseplate make the magazines easier to handle (access from pouch, grip and insertion into pistol) in puches rather than the oposite? Or do you stick your pistol mags bumper side down in pouches ? EDIT: I asked on Cybergun Facebook if they had any release date plans and if they could tell who the OEM was. They only responded to the first question with "No". Our definitions of "COOMING SOON!" are probably very different... :| Link to post Share on other sites
kenxin Posted February 14, 2014 Report Share Posted February 14, 2014 Well, the instagram pictures do give a few things away: Most notable of all, the metal inner frame is incomplete, lacking even the takedown lever notch hole. The extractor looks like a separate piece The front sight (kind of hard to tell) does look more like the VFC fake nightsight type The rear sight looks dovetailed so it might be RS compatible Link to post Share on other sites
aznriptide859 Posted February 14, 2014 Report Share Posted February 14, 2014 So detailed kenxin lol. Link to post Share on other sites
RacingManiac Posted February 14, 2014 Report Share Posted February 14, 2014 If they had made the BBU to play nice with RMR it may well be dovetailed since traditionally you don't have material under that to do it... Link to post Share on other sites
NonEx Posted February 14, 2014 Report Share Posted February 14, 2014 I'm gonna assume it's VFC just because it's Cybergun and they did the M&P thingy together etc. The Glock takes RS sights as does the M&P, so you would hope, if it is VFC, they follow that direction with this. But if all guns that look dovetailed took RS sights, well then all airsoft pistols whose RS counterpart had dovetailed sights would take RS sights Since the tend to replicate the look and not the functionality. Also, RS rear sight compatability + RMR sight compatability = super tiny and compromised muzzle and gas blow back volume ? Speaking of the VFC PPQ slide integrity (previous page), and the new instagram pics. I just caught something looking at it. It's probably nothing, but I thought it was kinda funny so I made this; It doesn't look anywhere near as thin as the PPQ slide, but it doesn't look super thick either. Not saying it's a problem just a funny observation in relation to the PPQ. Link to post Share on other sites
WTF?Shane Posted February 14, 2014 Report Share Posted February 14, 2014 The slide says stainless steel. JK. It would be nice. Link to post Share on other sites
RacingManiac Posted February 14, 2014 Report Share Posted February 14, 2014 I am assuming the flood of RMR sighted Glock are due to the fact that TM made the G18C with the "D-shaped" piston/cylinder since the RS G18C has that pocket up top. The fact that it worked pretty well means they just adopted that to the 17 and made room to mount the RMR up there. Guns like Hi-Capa or 1911 will be harder since the BBU takes up so much room up there. Link to post Share on other sites
Roland1014 Posted February 14, 2014 Report Share Posted February 14, 2014 I will accept a VFC. I wonder if they'll make some nice regulated CO2 mags so I can run ACE1's OSP on it? Link to post Share on other sites
tquilha Posted February 15, 2014 Report Share Posted February 15, 2014 The FNX was one of those pistols I'd love toget for my collection. but, with cyber$%&! thrown in... I'll wait and see. Link to post Share on other sites
PureSilver Posted February 17, 2014 Report Share Posted February 17, 2014 I am assuming the flood of RMR sighted Glock are due to the fact that TM made the G18C with the "D-shaped" piston/cylinder since the RS G18C has that pocket up top. The fact that it worked pretty well means they just adopted that to the 17 and made room to mount the RMR up there. I don't have much (any) experience with disassembling TM GLOCKs, but if the TM G17 and G18C have D-shaped BBUs as standard, why does it require an entirely new BBU to fit an RMR in the GunsModify kits? Speaking of the VFC PPQ slide integrity (previous page), and the new instagram pics. I just caught something looking at it. [...] It doesn't look anywhere near as thin as the PPQ slide, but it doesn't look super thick either. Yeah, I didn't think that looked very promising either! That said, that area is pretty thin in pretty much every pistol slide I own so fingers crossed... Well, the instagram pictures do give a few things away I'd be wary of reading too much into what I hope is a very early prototype (hope, because that gun looks rough as f***; I could get my hand into that slide gap) but I think you're right about the rather short inner frame. I hope the plastics are a good polycarbonate. Link to post Share on other sites
Danke Posted February 17, 2014 Report Share Posted February 17, 2014 I don't have much (any) experience with disassembling TM GLOCKs, but if the TM G17 and G18C have D-shaped BBUs as standard, why does it require an entirely new BBU to fit an RMR in the GunsModify kits? The TMs come with plastic slides. The BBU has to be metal and of a signifigant size to not blow up. Till now all the folks who make metal slides just made them to drop in the stock BBU. Ditto for the cloners; they want their stuff to swap. Link to post Share on other sites
RacingManiac Posted February 17, 2014 Report Share Posted February 17, 2014 Only G18C has D-shape BBU....17 does not. I don't have the GM kit so I don't know what exactly is the difference from it to the stock 18C or 17. Link to post Share on other sites
NonEx Posted February 17, 2014 Report Share Posted February 17, 2014 Yeah, I didn't think that looked very promising either! That said, that area is pretty thin in pretty much every pistol slide I own so fingers crossed... Yeah I took a look at my Stark Glock 19 and that slide has about the same thickness as pictured for the FNX so I suppose it's fine. Link to post Share on other sites
scorch Posted February 17, 2014 Report Share Posted February 17, 2014 The key thing probably won't be how thick it is, but how hard the chamber impacts it and at what angle. Link to post Share on other sites
NonEx Posted February 17, 2014 Report Share Posted February 17, 2014 That is also true I guess. Only 1+ year until we find out Link to post Share on other sites
FireKnife Posted February 17, 2014 Report Share Posted February 17, 2014 Was answered above, it's a +1 bumper (RS style). And doesn't a bigger baseplate make the magazines easier to handle (access from pouch, grip and insertion into pistol) in puches rather than the oposite? Or do you stick your pistol mags bumper side down in pouches ? Just saw this . I will be honest I don't care if it is a +1 plate, it is an airsoft magazine and with other manufacturers (KSC/KWA on the USPc and TM on the Glock 17/18c and the 26) they offer a flush fit standard plate as well as extended ones. I find that a flush fit plate is easier to work with as it keeps a near similar side profile and easier to get out of non-plastic magazine pouches that enclose much of the magazine. But that is just me however I think that if they don't offer both plate options they will be missing a trick that many others have done. I would say you would be suprised how little a difference in a guns design or options could affect the sale but look who I am talking to . 'FireKnife' Link to post Share on other sites
Im going space Posted February 20, 2014 Report Share Posted February 20, 2014 unf, (slightly off airsoft but mmmhmmm) Link to post Share on other sites
Im going space Posted February 20, 2014 Report Share Posted February 20, 2014 Well, the instagram pictures do give a few things away: Most notable of all, the metal inner frame is incomplete, lacking even the takedown lever notch hole. The extractor looks like a separate piece The front sight (kind of hard to tell) does look more like the VFC fake nightsight type The rear sight looks dovetailed so it might be RS compatible I SEE AN RMR CUT IN THE SLIDE DDDD: Link to post Share on other sites
bankz5152 Posted February 24, 2014 Report Share Posted February 24, 2014 So anyone got an idea of when this is coming out? Has it been confirmed as Stark/VFC or bloody KWC? On my phone, my spelling will suck. Link to post Share on other sites
NonEx Posted February 24, 2014 Report Share Posted February 24, 2014 Not in 2014 and no OEM cited, but likely VFC (guess). Link to post Share on other sites
bankz5152 Posted February 24, 2014 Report Share Posted February 24, 2014 . Guess I shall buy an HK45 or an M&P then Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.