toyboy Posted May 20, 2006 Report Share Posted May 20, 2006 And they claim that they're complicated?! Link to post Share on other sites
Alex6714 Posted May 20, 2006 Report Share Posted May 20, 2006 lol very true... Link to post Share on other sites
ianhaz Posted May 20, 2006 Report Share Posted May 20, 2006 Hahahahahahah common ore ahahaha I actually almost broke my face from laughing at this thread. Truely awesome Link to post Share on other sites
phoenix360mute Posted May 21, 2006 Report Share Posted May 21, 2006 he he, its funny because its true Link to post Share on other sites
juicymeat Posted May 21, 2006 Report Share Posted May 21, 2006 the first diagram with the equation is so true...esp for a broke college student like me Link to post Share on other sites
visionviper Posted May 21, 2006 Report Share Posted May 21, 2006 The equation was solved improperly in the first one. Oh well, they were still all good. Link to post Share on other sites
SilentSerpent Posted May 21, 2006 Report Share Posted May 21, 2006 oh god, it's gonna be so hard not to write that first one down in my physics A level exam in a weeks time, i'll just have to hope the examiner is male. Edit: can't see how it's solved incorrectly, care to enlighten me? SS Link to post Share on other sites
Hardcore_Mitsuko Posted May 21, 2006 Report Share Posted May 21, 2006 Isn't it meant to say money is the root of all evil, and prove that all women are evil? Link to post Share on other sites
Jammy_Stuff Posted May 21, 2006 Report Share Posted May 21, 2006 Isn't it meant to say money is the root of all evil, and prove that all women are evil? <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Yup. That's the proper one and he didn't even solve it right. He phail. Link to post Share on other sites
visionviper Posted May 22, 2006 Report Share Posted May 22, 2006 can't see how it's solved incorrectly, care to enlighten me? The square root of problems was squared, but the other side, women, wasn't squared. It would be fine if instead of women it was a 1, but women is a variable, and so it needs to be sqaured. So if both sides of the equation were squared like it should have been, it would have been interpreted as having more than 1 girlfriend/wife causes problems. Link to post Share on other sites
SWORD09 Posted May 22, 2006 Report Share Posted May 22, 2006 The square root of problems was squared, but the other side, women, wasn't squared. It would be fine if instead of women it was a 1, but women is a variable, and so it needs to be sqaured. So if both sides of the equation were squared like it should have been, it would have been interpreted as having more than 1 girlfriend/wife causes problems. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> the entire equation works out fine though. because there are 2 "money", so its squared and that means problems is squared, but its square rooted, so that cancels it out. how is the equation wrong? it sure is funny though Link to post Share on other sites
bigfish312 Posted May 22, 2006 Report Share Posted May 22, 2006 every thing else worked out true tho Link to post Share on other sites
Wraith18A Posted May 22, 2006 Report Share Posted May 22, 2006 They should make one: "Women v. Men: Decision Making Process" Men: 1) Receive problem. 2) Decide on solution. 3) Execute. Women: 1) Receive problem. 2) Consult friends. 3) Arrive at possible solution set. 4) Receive half-remembered comment that doubles apparent problem. 4) Scratch first solution set, readjust and decide on new possible solution. 5) Consult Grandmother. 6) Grandmother convinces woman that all solutions are wrong. 7) Solution Set Build 3. 8) Mother weighs in on equation. 9) Sisters adjust what mother says. Solution Set at Build 7. 10) Another discussion with all parties involved, but at separate times with half-remembered or partial information passed. 11) Solution Set Build 13. 12) PMS. Girl ditches all solutions, to return to initial decision, but out of spite, declines to actually implement solutions. 13) "That Time of the Month". Complete mental breakdown, results in a random selection of solution and execution. Problem has been completely morphed from what was initially reported. Link to post Share on other sites
visionviper Posted May 22, 2006 Report Share Posted May 22, 2006 the entire equation works out fine though. because there are 2 "money", so its squared and that means problems is squared, but its square rooted, so that cancels it out. how is the equation wrong? I doesn't make a difference what formed the square root of problems, but what does is the fact that only one side of the equation was sqaured. If you square one side of an equation, you must square the other. Link to post Share on other sites
nobody Posted May 22, 2006 Report Share Posted May 22, 2006 I doesn't make a difference what formed the square root of problems, but what does is the fact that only one side of the equation was sqaured. If you square one side of an equation, you must square the other. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Not very good at maths are you? Money = problems^(1/2) was subsituted into the equation women=money^2 Link to post Share on other sites
Rob15 Posted May 22, 2006 Report Share Posted May 22, 2006 Hahahahaha. I 'd *saves those* Link to post Share on other sites
Banzai Posted May 23, 2006 Report Share Posted May 23, 2006 Hilarious, just splendid, too bad nearly all those pics are older than Hav0c's Inferiority complex. Link to post Share on other sites
Mongadillo Posted May 25, 2006 Report Share Posted May 25, 2006 Very Funny, but i can't belive ur all aoctually disscussing the mathmatical accuracy of a joke. U Need to get out more guys Link to post Share on other sites
DirtyMoFo Posted May 25, 2006 Report Share Posted May 25, 2006 you say that now... wait till your a regula Link to post Share on other sites
Crazy_Harry Posted May 25, 2006 Report Share Posted May 25, 2006 you should see my bloody wife- she can't go shopping without spending $100 on two items, and thats when we didn't have any money. Seriously. I'd say "I need to get some socks". While I was wandering through the sock section trying to find the cheapest socks they had, I'd later find out, at the cash register, that she'd picked out about twenty items of clothing, and was refusing, in near-tears, to accpet the fact that we simply couldn't afford to buy all that, at least if I wanted to wear socks and we wanted to keep a roof over our head. She did it yesterday too. Spent $112 on a couple of bras and a dress she didn't even try on. Bought me a tent of a shirt to excuse her splurge, and then got sniffy when I said "well, I was going to buy a super cheap CYMA .028s this month, but I thought we couldn't afford it, so held off. Well, we definately can't now. I'm taking that effing bank card off her, first chance I get. Link to post Share on other sites
Banzai Posted May 26, 2006 Report Share Posted May 26, 2006 Sounds like personal issues. SHe needs counseling for "OSA" Over shoppers anonymous Link to post Share on other sites
visionviper Posted May 26, 2006 Report Share Posted May 26, 2006 Not very good at maths are you? Money = problems^(1/2) was subsituted into the equation women=money^2 I looked it over again, I see what you mean. I missed the women=money^2 part. Other than that, as to your "Not very good at maths are you?", I am actually quite good at math. I scored a 700 in math on the SAT, as well as always getting 98/99 percentile on the standardized testing in math. Link to post Share on other sites
The Waco Kid Posted May 26, 2006 Report Share Posted May 26, 2006 It would be fine if instead of women it was a 1, but women is a variable, and so it needs to be sqaured. So if both sides of the equation were squared like it should have been, it would have been interpreted as having more than 1 girlfriend/wife causes problems. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Highlighted for the truth. I'm really good at maths. I just spent two years arguing with the inland revenue & got a rebate. / Link to post Share on other sites
Banzai Posted May 26, 2006 Report Share Posted May 26, 2006 I looked it over again, I see what you mean. I missed the women=money^2 part. Other than that, as to your "Not very good at maths are you?", I am actually quite good at math. I scored a 700 in math on the SAT, as well as always getting 98/99 percentile on the standardized testing in math. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Oh yeah? Well mine's bigger! So there! Link to post Share on other sites
Belladonna Posted May 27, 2006 Report Share Posted May 27, 2006 Interesting pics. seen the equaiton one before, loved the militery tactics one how true is that? Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.