SWE_Thompa Posted February 9, 2010 Report Share Posted February 9, 2010 depends, pantac is now up to atleast 3 different versions of their RG, and they differ allot from eachother... I have a sucky camera so I cant take any reference pictures but the last version of pantac is much darker kinda kompared to EI and AIs RG that I also have. remember the first version was really light green kinda, the 2nd version is a bit darker but not to dark. I have 2 frag pouches from pantac on my EI/AI RRV because I couldnt source any EI ones and one of the pouches stands out as to light but the 2nd almost looks like EIs RG. But the latest pantac RG is to dark for my taste... Link to post Share on other sites
Speed= Posted February 9, 2010 Report Share Posted February 9, 2010 Out of the rrv, epc, mbav, mbss, etc. What do y'all think gives you the most room to shoulder your weapon? Thanks guys. Link to post Share on other sites
Fatal Posted February 9, 2010 Author Report Share Posted February 9, 2010 Depends solely on what you have on your vest, and how you shoulder your weapon. But to give you an answer, I would say the RRV with bib folded down. Link to post Share on other sites
Speed= Posted February 9, 2010 Report Share Posted February 9, 2010 Maybe it's me but I tend to tuck the butt more inside my shoulder. Here I'll show you pics. Since I've been using my IBA a lot that should be a good reference no? Link to post Share on other sites
Pkekyo-Nor Posted February 12, 2010 Report Share Posted February 12, 2010 http://www.arniesairsoft.co.uk/forums/inde...t&p=2279693 Â ^ Got a new toy, and kinda wanna Ranger it up ca. '09, anyone got some advice on this front? Any chance of getting away with a Para stock? Â Also, running 100rds cloth mags, should I go for the buckled or non-buckled ammo pouches? Link to post Share on other sites
SWE_Thompa Posted February 12, 2010 Report Share Posted February 12, 2010 nice gun, but thats a M249, not a MK46. You will have to do some modifications if you want it to look like a MK46 so you know. Link to post Share on other sites
Pkekyo-Nor Posted February 12, 2010 Report Share Posted February 12, 2010 I know what it is, and that it's not Ranger legit as of now: this is why I'm asking for proper advice here. Link to post Share on other sites
cfg123 Posted February 13, 2010 Report Share Posted February 13, 2010 My MICH(still need 1 hole Norortos) And my RRV RLCS RRV RLCS pistol mag pouch RLCS SAW pouch SFLCS 3 mag shingle Signal pouch CAT EMS shears Link to post Share on other sites
SWE_Thompa Posted February 13, 2010 Report Share Posted February 13, 2010 I know what it is, and that it's not Ranger legit as of now: this is why I'm asking for proper advice here.  OK here it comes  para stock works OK if you belive this picture: http://s7.photobucket.com/albums/y291/Magn...t=Ranger1-1.jpg  the problem with converting M249 to a MK46 is 2: 1. The magazine "port"(whatever its called in english) on the left side doesnt exist on MK46s 2.The mount to have it vehicle mounted just below the gas regulator on the M249 doesnt exist on the MK46.  Those are the big ones. the rest can easy be fixed by adding/changing this on your gun: *Barrel: its distinctive cooling parts and that it has no gas regulator, so its a key item http://www.redwolfairsoft.com/redwolf/airs...il?prodID=23804  *RAS: I cant find a correct one right now (lack of time, at work atm) but you need the RAS ontop of the barrel as well where you mount PEQ-15 as well.  Then a eotech or aimpoint to finish it off.  and if you get your hands on a pair of real MK46 bipods you are the king... they differ allot from the M249. (although I have seen a few MK46s with M249 bipod but thats on internet, cant remember seeing it on any ranger pics)  Thats all i can think of now, Im not sure what flashlight you should use, probleby the same as the Block 2 thingy on the M4...  Dang, this makes me regret I sold my G&P MK46 Link to post Share on other sites
Trzewinski Posted February 17, 2010 Report Share Posted February 17, 2010 Your RRS-V isn't RLCS at all buddy Link to post Share on other sites
Jolly15 Posted February 17, 2010 Report Share Posted February 17, 2010 He's already been notified on another forum. Link to post Share on other sites
crotmate Posted February 17, 2010 Report Share Posted February 17, 2010 What makes it RLCS? Or rather in this case, not? Link to post Share on other sites
Fatal Posted February 17, 2010 Author Report Share Posted February 17, 2010 Alice webbing Link to post Share on other sites
crotmate Posted February 17, 2010 Report Share Posted February 17, 2010 Ah, thanks. Link to post Share on other sites
cfg123 Posted February 17, 2010 Report Share Posted February 17, 2010 Yah, I figured that out on wannabe. I'm pretty sure the pouches are RLCS at least(except for the SFLCS shingle Link to post Share on other sites
Fatal Posted February 17, 2010 Author Report Share Posted February 17, 2010 Well, you could post a picture of the tags and someone could let you know for sure. Link to post Share on other sites
cfg123 Posted February 17, 2010 Report Share Posted February 17, 2010 I got them from a guy who said that they were in some gov. auction. They say 746 on a green tag. I don't really care if they aren't because i got them pretty cheap and they look the part, so it's not to much of a downer. Link to post Share on other sites
crotmate Posted February 17, 2010 Report Share Posted February 17, 2010 With RLCS, what benefits does it have over a simple RRV? Link to post Share on other sites
Hispeed1 Posted February 17, 2010 Report Share Posted February 17, 2010 Big Army finally decided to use Multicam in A-stan. Too bad the Bat boys are already using it. Better late than never. Good riddance UCP-D. Â http://soldiersystems.net/2010/02/17/army-...in-afghanistan/ Link to post Share on other sites
Jolly15 Posted February 18, 2010 Report Share Posted February 18, 2010 With RLCS, what benefits does it have over a simple RRV? You get cool-guy points, a dent in your wallet, and that's about it. Link to post Share on other sites
Agent Hunk Posted February 18, 2010 Report Share Posted February 18, 2010 And some will probably swear on their grannies its built better and different under a certain spectrum of light. Link to post Share on other sites
Pkekyo-Nor Posted February 18, 2010 Report Share Posted February 18, 2010 It just looks prettier and tidier without that shiny-*albatross* ALICE webbing Link to post Share on other sites
crotmate Posted February 18, 2010 Report Share Posted February 18, 2010 Ah, I get it now, didnt actually realise what that shiny stuff underneath was. Cheers Pkekyo. Link to post Share on other sites
sbe6287 Posted February 22, 2010 Report Share Posted February 22, 2010 Just ordered a ranger green color Mar CIRAS. What kind of extra pouches would be best to put on it? Link to post Share on other sites
buzzsaw Posted February 22, 2010 Report Share Posted February 22, 2010 Unless I'm very much mistaken, Rangers use the Land CIRAS, and so it doesn't really matter what pouches you put on it. Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.