Habakure Posted March 25, 2015 Report Share Posted March 25, 2015 Semantics. If you're suspended from carrying out your job, that's a sacking. I honestly don't get why people think it's okay to verbally abuse a work colleague. He did it and was on his last warning, let the conspiracy theories fly. Link to post Share on other sites
hitmanNo2 Posted March 25, 2015 Report Share Posted March 25, 2015 Whilst it's obviously not cool what Clarkson did. Do we know what the other guy was doing or is it accepted he was just standing there taking abuse? Link to post Share on other sites
Baddbaz Posted March 25, 2015 Report Share Posted March 25, 2015 He still has another contrAct with them till sept 2015 for other programs. , no mention of that one being terminated as of yet . The top gear one was due to run out about now anyway So technically he has not been sacked , Link to post Share on other sites
Skarclaw Posted March 25, 2015 Report Share Posted March 25, 2015 Clarkson is an oaf but he winds up the professionally offended so is ok in my books. People in media are utter *Ubarflock* (I have it on good authority that Konnie Huq is a bit of a *badgeress* and made someone travel literally miles for a specific sandwich) but if you've ever complained about your boss/manager its hard to defend what he did. He needs to get his ego in check asap then go to netflix and make £££. Reminder: In 2012-13 200,000 people were prosecuted for failing to pay for a tv license. Failing to pay tv license makes up about 1/10 court cases. BBC don't actually have detector vans - that's just a scare tactic. They do it on a database level and random chance. You also don't have to let them in your house. But they might turn up with a copper if you don't. Luckily you don't have to let them in your house either. Talk through the letterbox instead! Link to post Share on other sites
hitmanNo2 Posted March 25, 2015 Report Share Posted March 25, 2015 Are there really that many people going to court due to TV licensing? Madness. I was under the impression they could only prosecute you if you admitted to watching TV or if they caught you red handed i.e. film you through your window watching TV. I await Clarkson's return on Netflix/Sky on "Full Throttle" Or *fruitcage* it. Let's go nice and simple with just "Power" Link to post Share on other sites
scorch Posted March 25, 2015 Report Share Posted March 25, 2015 People in media are utter *Ubarflock* (I have it on good authority that Konnie Huq is a bit of a *badgeress* and made someone travel literally miles for a specific sandwich) I've not met many folks from the media, but strangely TV angry man Gordon Ramsay was a nice bloke, and kids TV presenter Michael Underwood was an arrogant *beep* who couldn't handle his drink, didn't know when to cut his losses and stop gambling and thought he was better than everyone around him. Link to post Share on other sites
Skarclaw Posted March 25, 2015 Report Share Posted March 25, 2015 Are there really that many people going to court due to TV licensing? Madness. I was under the impression they could only prosecute you if you admitted to watching TV or if they caught you red handed i.e. film you through your window watching TV. I await Clarkson's return on Netflix/Sky on "Full Throttle" Or *fruitcage* it. Let's go nice and simple with just "Power" Depressingly, yes. Also unlike a parking fine etc you will have criminal record. Madness! Link to post Share on other sites
hitmanNo2 Posted March 25, 2015 Report Share Posted March 25, 2015 Damn. That is messed up. Link to post Share on other sites
Tw1tch Posted March 25, 2015 Report Share Posted March 25, 2015 So, the managers said she has an attitude problem, he tells her, and then she tells everyone in work? Why wasn't he punished? Sounds like typical bad management to me. Well he told his missus who probabaly then mouthed off at a manager. And he is being punished I reckon as three team leaders were interviewed for shift leader, two were given the job as soon as the interview was over while he was told he'd be informed. Wouldn't be surprised if he didn't get it for not being able to keep confidentiality. And they seem to think I must be psychic. But the reason I asked to be included in daily comms was to increase efficiency and my independence. Link to post Share on other sites
Hedganian Posted March 25, 2015 Report Share Posted March 25, 2015 Are there really that many people going to court due to TV licensing? Madness. Madness that so many people are flouting the law, or madness that they're being caught and prosecuted for it? Regardless of your opinion of the BBC - personally I don't rate them highly - or the government/taxes in general, it's the LAW. If you want to own and watch TV, you have to pay the "License fee" - basically just a tax - the same as you must pay the tax if you want to own and drive a car, or pay income tax, NI subscriptions, VAT, fuel excise duty and all the other taxes we struggle under the burden of. Maybe it's not fair - but what's even LESS fair is that some people should get away without paying, thereby increasing the burden on everyone else to make up the shortfall. Link to post Share on other sites
Skarclaw Posted March 25, 2015 Report Share Posted March 25, 2015 Madness that so many people are flouting the law, or madness that they're being caught and prosecuted for it? Regardless of your opinion of the BBC - personally I don't rate them highly - or the government/taxes in general, it's the LAW. If you want to own and watch TV, you have to pay the "License fee" - basically just a tax - the same as you must pay the tax if you want to own and drive a car, or pay income tax, NI subscriptions, VAT, fuel excise duty and all the other taxes we struggle under the burden of. Maybe it's not fair - but what's even LESS fair is that some people should get away without paying, thereby increasing the burden on everyone else to make up the shortfall. "One who breaks an unjust law that conscience tells him is unjust, and who willingly accepts the penalty of imprisonment in order to arouse the conscience of the community over its injustice, is in reality expressing the highest respect for law." Discuss What I mean is if I import something which should I should pay income tax for, and it comes to my door without being "hit by customs" then that's great - I've lucked out! I guess that they could send me an invoice after? (I don't know this but would be interesting to find out). Anyway I guess what I'm trying to say is that I consider not paying the license fee like that. If you get caught then gutted but until they catch you? Any unfairness in this situation is down to the people instigating it which is the beeb imo. Link to post Share on other sites
hitmanNo2 Posted March 25, 2015 Report Share Posted March 25, 2015 Poor BBC. They'll have less money to cover up their child molesters and to pointlessly spend on refurbishing their perfectly fine offices. Link to post Share on other sites
Hedganian Posted March 25, 2015 Report Share Posted March 25, 2015 "One who breaks an unjust law that conscience tells him is unjust, and who willingly accepts the penalty of imprisonment in order to arouse the conscience of the community over its injustice, is in reality expressing the highest respect for law." Discuss Taxation is unjust? Especially taxation on non-essential luxuries such as television? Link to post Share on other sites
Baddbaz Posted March 25, 2015 Report Share Posted March 25, 2015 Yep they will have less money and will be looking to joe public to recoup all that lost revenue Tv licence fee increase is around the corner methinx !! Link to post Share on other sites
Skarclaw Posted March 25, 2015 Report Share Posted March 25, 2015 Taxation is unjust? Especially taxation on non-essential luxuries such as television? For the most part - yes it is. But even then I think the onus is on the party creating the unfairness which imo is the BBC, not the people avoiding it. Specifically speaking - if television is a non-essential luxury why are people being taxed to fund it? If the Government can make ISP's get people to "opt in" to not having pre-made filters they can do the same for television. I can't see how the BBC or the idea of a public/statebroadcaster can be justified. Link to post Share on other sites
amateurstuntman Posted March 25, 2015 Report Share Posted March 25, 2015 So UK Tactical want £40 plus shipping for a set of Sawfly frames and smoke lens (there is currently 15% off eyewear though I guess) when I can get a full set of (admittedly surplus) Sawfly's for £35 from next to my work. Thing is I only need the frame and smoke lens as someone pinched mine. I suppose I could always ebay a frame and some smoke glasses but they all seem to be American sellers. I can't wear the large set I have (I didn't realise there were different sizes) for skirmishing as I got a BB bounce inside with them and I'm yet to experiment with other eye pro. Considering full seal given the injuries I've seen but I fog like hell. Some of the Smith optics (just not the boogie regulators) seem quite handy. So yeah, I know this was 4 months ago but I have been looking for my missing Sawfly revision glasses since then and I just found them on the dashboard of a truck at work. Some *albatross* hat stole them. Anyway, I have stolen them back and I still don't want them. Do you still want them? I can't find a size on them though. Link to post Share on other sites
Tw1tch Posted March 25, 2015 Report Share Posted March 25, 2015 I'm good thanks Stunt. I managed to sort a pair and I'm sure there's a better home for them somewhere. Thanks again. Link to post Share on other sites
scorch Posted March 26, 2015 Report Share Posted March 26, 2015 Weetabix are flat. My bowl is rounded. They don't sit right. #firstworldproblems Link to post Share on other sites
Habakure Posted March 26, 2015 Report Share Posted March 26, 2015 I find adding just a bit of milk to the weetabix, till its soggy enough for preferred soggynes, helps with the curved bowl Base dilemma. Link to post Share on other sites
shmook Posted March 26, 2015 Report Share Posted March 26, 2015 What hab said. Milk fixes weetabix-based problems Link to post Share on other sites
Skarclaw Posted March 26, 2015 Report Share Posted March 26, 2015 I don't care what people get up to in the privacy of their own home - but if you want to put butter on your wheatbix, don't ever ask me to "accept it". I'll tolerate it, sure. But accept it? Not gonna happen. Call be a bigot if you want but its just not right. Link to post Share on other sites
shmook Posted March 26, 2015 Report Share Posted March 26, 2015 Butter? *fruitcage* butter? Shoot them. Link to post Share on other sites
scorch Posted March 26, 2015 Report Share Posted March 26, 2015 I find adding just a bit of milk to the weetabix, till its soggy enough for preferred soggynes, helps with the curved bowl Base dilemma. The problem lies in the fact that to get the bottom of the weetabix sufficiently soggy, you have a load of milk in the bottom of the bowl completely untouched. So when the weetabix gets to where I want it, it drops into the excess milk and goes too far. And I'm not gonna pre-snap my weetabix so they fit the bowl. That way lies madness. I'd rather acquire a more suitable bowl. Link to post Share on other sites
Tw1tch Posted March 26, 2015 Report Share Posted March 26, 2015 So the network in this crummy house has been disconnecting me at about 6PM the past few days and it actually disappeared yesterday. Don't know when I'll be able to get it back. Link to post Share on other sites
DrAlexanderTobacco Posted March 26, 2015 Report Share Posted March 26, 2015 Weetabix are flat. My bowl is rounded. They don't sit right. #firstworldproblems This scientific paper might help! https://docs.google.com/document/d/1MMmJtGMPF80LfkBNfR0BWmFSmupL5odHcKJBjjusbqc/edit?usp=sharing Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.