Jump to content

WW2 Kit Discussion


PrivateCobb

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 1.9k
  • Created
  • Last Reply
_MARS,Mar 16 2007, 09:06 PM]Almost as much as the TOP.  The front sight hood and post are plastic however.

 

Not on mine :huh: the only plastic on the AGM I have or the ones I have seen is the grips and body panels, where they are plastic or bakelite on the original.

 

MP40FullLeft1_med_photo.png

 

 

 

Lá Fhéile Pádraig Shona Duit

 

Slainte!

 

 

-G

Link to post
Share on other sites

Must resist urge to slaughter K98 or the Waffenamt Nagant for Airsoft an amazing AirSoft rifle.

 

42.jpg

 

Not strictly AirSoft but its a picture from an Event my WWII Unit Sponsored. It's based on a Russian tank and was used in Saving Private Ryan IIRC.

Link to post
Share on other sites
The two Tiger tanks featured in Saving Private Ryan are reproductions built on the chassis of Russian T-34 tanks. Operational Tiger I's are extremely rare, and could not have been used for rigorous film production, let alone a movie in which the plot requires one of them to be destroyed.

 

The T-34 was chosen because of its overall size and barrel height. The reproductions were based on measurements taken of a Tiger I at the Tank Museum in Bovington, England, and were constructed by Plus Film Services. The upper hull and turret were sized to proportionally match the chassis of the T-34. Band of Brothers, the HBO mini-series produced by Steven Spielberg and Tom Hanks, used a similar construction process to recreate Tiger I tanks out of readily available T-34s.

 

The most obvious visual difference between a real Tiger I and the reproductions are the tracks, which do not feature the Tiger I's overlapping wheel design. Although the front of the tank features the appropriate machine gun and driver's viewport, these two features are a source of great controversy.

 

The small machine gun of a Tiger I was normally manned by the tank's radio operator, but the gun is fired only briefly during the Battle of Ramelle—blink and you'll miss it (screen capture 1 | screen capture 2). The machine gun on the second Tiger can be seen to move slightly just before it is destroyed. It is possible that both tanks had limited ammo for their machine guns, or that one was out of ammo and the other damaged, or that both tanks had injured radio operators. An operational machine gun on just one of the tanks could have made for some dramatic moments. As it is, the limited machine gun fire in the film is so brief as to be non-existant (and one wonders if it was a post-production CGI effect).

 

The driver's viewport on a Tiger I featured 6 layers of armored glass, as well as another sheet just behind them. These systems would have prevented Captain Miller from simply sticking his submachine gun up to the port and spraying the inside of the driver's compartment with bullets. Curiously, just a fraction of a second before the second Tiger is destroyed by a P-51, the driver's viewport is shown as having been replaced with a flat, unconvincing piece of material with what looks to be the driver's port painted on! This can only be seen for a few frames (see screenshot number 8) , and is more than likely the result of whatever work was done to rig the tank for an explosion.

 

Another inaccuracy is the fact that the paratroopers easily open the tank commander's hatch, which would have been locked from the inside in order to prevent the enemy from using such an easy way to kill a tank crew. There is some criticism that the tank commanders are seen with their hatches open, thus exposing themselves to enemy fire, but this is actually a common way in which a tank commander would operate his vehicle, as it afforded him the best view of the battlefield. Obviously a tank commander had to use caution as to when and where he could safely open the hatch.

 

Both Tiger tanks feature the insignia of the I SS Panzer Corps, a unit that would not have been near the Merderet River on June 13th, 1944.

 

Because of the limited number that had been constructed, and the disposition of German forces on June 13, 1944, the date of the Battle of Ramelle, it is highly unlikely that any Tiger I tanks would have been in or around Ramelle at that time. The use of the Tiger I in Saving Private Ryan has much more to do with its reputation and popularity than historical accuracy.

 

The two Tiger I replicas from Saving Private Ryan were stored at The Tank Museum in Bovington, England for a time, but they have apparently been sold and removed from the museum. It looks like one of the tanks may have found its way to the United States, as one was reportedly used for a reenactment of the Battle of Carentan in Monterey, California by the World War II Research and Preservation Society. An article on the reenactment indicates that the Tiger tank is owned by Joe Fazio of San Francisco.

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 2 weeks later...

LOL 7th Kompanie is full of Geardo's. They probably take it too seriously. We're probably one of the few units that have issues with having to many MG42s/ MP40s

ReadingJune2006022.jpg

You can kinda see what I mean lol.

 

Our Feldgendarmerie has 8 men with 8 MP40s. Always makes nice for a display.

 

I'm glad we get to shoot at the Tiger now. Last event it went to the Tranny was all *fruitcage*ed up so it never went in the field. Cost them 4400 USD to have it shipped to the event too...

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hehehe......

 

We don't have that problem I must say - our loadouts are determined at Kompanie level, though as we are a fallschirmjaeger lot, we can get away with running in inordinate number of shorteez.

 

Our biggest problem seems to be that our kit looks too *nice* - we have some excellent shops serviing the uniform market in Japan, but they never quite look haggard enough and are faaaaaar too expensive to manually distress. :D

 

(as if the sight of 11 Japanese salarymen - and one fat brit - dressed up as Germans and pretending Wada Forest is Crete wasn't dodgey enough)

Link to post
Share on other sites

LOL. Hong Kong baby. 130 bucks for any model tunic/pant set shipped to my door in three days. I don't feel so bad about destroying them. Actually the Hong Kong guys aren't just copying American companies. They're using original tunics to base their stuff on. They've been releasing stuff that most American companies haven't even scene before.

 

In fact one of the guys in our unit has a prosthetic leg and he has a pair of pants with a shredded bloodied leg that he uses for public displays in the field hospital.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hong Kong? Bl**dy hell! I had a suit made there in a morning once - should have known that someone there would have cottoned onto this market.

 

Just so you can compare: Last uniform jacket I bought here (from S and Graf in 2003) was a 1941 pattern Officer's Drop Jacket - short. And without patching or badges it came to 32,000 yen. :( (was a little over priced as I am so porky, but still.....)

 

You have a name, or a website or some contact information maybe? :)

 

Time for me to get surfing.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and the use of session cookies.