hardboiledcop Posted August 6, 2007 Report Share Posted August 6, 2007 (edited) I am starting to believe the rumours that current scw3s are lower quality, I'd still say my bob chows were perfect, but other models dont seem to be holding up as older models did Best stock quality WA that I've owned is the fbi trial, really amazing, and would happily smash beer bottles at range. The reason I sold them both was, a) the total lack of availability of metal kits or upgrade options when I bought them, and b ) the lack of the hybrid slide for the fbi Edited August 6, 2007 by hardboiledcop Quote Link to post Share on other sites
liquidflorian Posted August 6, 2007 Report Share Posted August 6, 2007 (edited) I have heard a few disturbing rumors from folks with real knowledge about how some of the SCW guns are in fact Taiwan made... <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Do you know witch guns? Edited August 6, 2007 by liquidflorian Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Sale Posted August 7, 2007 Report Share Posted August 7, 2007 Only the limited edition SCW3 models are made in Japan anymore. The rest are made in Taiwan by KWC. You can easily tell the difference in finish, although KWC have improved a lot from what they were. Personally I think there may be a small difference in mechanical quality, but not a big one. The thing you would notice is the finish, but if you use a metal kit you won't know anyways. -Sale Quote Link to post Share on other sites
r.ocelot Posted August 7, 2007 Report Share Posted August 7, 2007 From what I've read, there's definitely a difference in mechanical quality, as evidenced by the Bow Chows performing the same as a SCW2, while the Kimber line has issues pertaining to the firing pin system. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
snowman Posted August 22, 2007 Report Share Posted August 22, 2007 No you haven't and no they haven't. The image trolling the forum of a snapped WA slide is most certainly not from use of green gas, there is no way a slide could snap down the middle, if anything the front would crack around the bushing.. How can I back up this claim? I've owned at least 20 different WA 1911 iterations, and in stock form all of them have handled green with gusto. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> I don't dispute your experience AND I'm sure it's not a common problem, if it ever was, BUT.... I have an SVI slide here that is split from the chamber down to the bottom of the slide. In time, it would have undoubtedly split in half (this came from a previous owner who provided it with the gun, so I don't know how much green gas it had consumed, but they said it was caused by that and not impact damage). Cheers. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Catman Posted August 22, 2007 Report Share Posted August 22, 2007 from what I've seen is the Infinity models that are the most prone to cracking the slide on green gas - typically happens on the right hand side by the ejection port. A guy at our site had his brand new Infinity Expert do this within a few mags of green gas. However the 1911 varients appear to be ok and hold up to green gas. As in terms of quality, the SCW3 range I've witnessed are for the most; pretty awful, one of the ones I handled was just not nice, certainly not something I'd expect to come in a box marked "Western Arms". A far, far cry from the excellent SCW2 quality - hardly suprising if they're being made by KWC! No wonder most aftermarket companies have jumped to the TM 1911 ship. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
hitmanNo2 Posted August 22, 2007 Report Share Posted August 22, 2007 Anyone have a source for WA's being made in Taiwan by KWC? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
r.ocelot Posted August 22, 2007 Report Share Posted August 22, 2007 My SVI's box says "Made in Japan"... Quote Link to post Share on other sites
snowman Posted August 22, 2007 Report Share Posted August 22, 2007 (edited) from what I've seen is the Infinity models that are the most prone to cracking the slide on green gas - typically happens on the right hand side by the ejection port. A guy at our site had his brand new Infinity Expert do this within a few mags of green gas. However the 1911 varients appear to be ok and hold up to green gas. As in terms of quality, the SCW3 range I've witnessed are for the most; pretty awful, one of the ones I handled was just not nice, certainly not something I'd expect to come in a box marked "Western Arms". A far, far cry from the excellent SCW2 quality - hardly suprising if they're being made by KWC! No wonder most aftermarket companies have jumped to the TM 1911 ship. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Yeah, ejection port is what I meant by chamber You need to be careful not to associate ALL SCW3 guns with Magnatechs. I've not seen a recent SCW3 WA, but I'd imagine there are low cost Magnatechs (no idea if they're made by KWC, but the similarity of WA's UZI to the KWC must lead to suspicion of a tie in somewhere) and high end guns, all using the same SCW3 gas system. Cheers PS Mods if you want to delete this post, feel free, others have said everything I have really - I shouldn't post after a long day Edited August 22, 2007 by snowman Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Sale Posted August 23, 2007 Report Share Posted August 23, 2007 (edited) KWC refer to being "technically supported by our strategic alliance in Japan as an OEM", and a lot of KWC models have similarities between Western Arms, so it kind of rules out any other Japanese company. The good old KWC M92FS Super Black HW (not to be confused with the non-HW version) has a WA type GBB mechanism, and their single stackers and the Desert Eagle have a very "Western Armish" design as well. KWA supply parts and manufacture entire guns for KSC, and KWA guns are understandably similar to - sometimes even carbon copies of - KSC models. So the connection between WA and KWC is a fairly safe bet. It's not like I have any source for this. Just putting 2 and 2 together. -Sale Edited August 23, 2007 by Sale Quote Link to post Share on other sites
PenGun Posted August 23, 2007 Report Share Posted August 23, 2007 My Wilson HiCap is the most unrealistic(WTF???), but probably the highest quality WA I had, well, when it was new. No rattling, tight fitting internals, current-TM-era quality metal used, and not a single parts has broken. At the risk of getting raped by all the WA SCW3 fanboys here, I'd say the failure rate is about the same as HFC m190s. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Yawn TM use poo for metal in their guns. Comparing older WAs to any TM is a joke. There is simply ZERO comparison. My P226 and DE have horrendous metal parts...they look like cheap pot-metal with a bare minimum of watery black paint. They also wear pretty badly...my Sig trigger now looks almost white for Gods sake, and the parts all have horrible casting seams. If WA can be accused of anything, it certainly isn't lack of realism, unless you mean having a real-steel equivalent. The other thing they can't be accused of is poor reliability. Unless...you run it off high pressure gasses in stock guns, with short recoil springs, and no slide buffers in Texas summer temperatures. That'll pretty much break anything I'd almost put money on something a little hotter than Green being put into those broken-slide victims So, TM make good shooters that now actually look half decent. And what do they choose to give us? A Glock and a 1911... Quote Link to post Share on other sites
snowman Posted August 23, 2007 Report Share Posted August 23, 2007 (edited) I have to agree with Pengun about TM metal. It's usually better than WEs or HFCs (although TM controls are often horrible even compared with these), but it still lags behind anything I've seen from WA (Up to an including the silver railed 6" SVIs) or KSC for that matter. Cheers. Edited August 23, 2007 by snowman Quote Link to post Share on other sites
hhsohn Posted August 23, 2007 Report Share Posted August 23, 2007 Generally agree with snowman, but I'd like to throw my increasing weight around my citing my own experience. The TM metal components (trigger/sear lock works, safeties, etc) are horrible. My first GBB was TM M9 with a metal slide, and after about two years, the trigger and safety felt like mush due to parts wear. My second hand WA Colt CDP 1911 is even more hard used, and all the controls still feel great. BUT, a WA 6" Xcellerator Hybrid had less than perfectly casted frames and hybrid barrels. They were pitted in places and some of the edges were malformed. I don't think newer WA's are like that, but I haven't seen that in even WE's. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
r.ocelot Posted August 24, 2007 Report Share Posted August 24, 2007 (edited) Yawn TM use poo for metal in their guns. Comparing older WAs to any TM is a joke. There is simply ZERO comparison. My P226 and DE have horrendous metal parts...they look like cheap pot-metal with a bare minimum of watery black paint. They also wear pretty badly...my Sig trigger now looks almost white for Gods sake, and the parts all have horrible casting seams. If WA can be accused of anything, it certainly isn't lack of realism, unless you mean having a real-steel equivalent. The other thing they can't be accused of is poor reliability. Unless...you run it off high pressure gasses in stock guns, with short recoil springs, and no slide buffers in Texas summer temperatures. That'll pretty much break anything I'd almost put money on something a little hotter than Green being put into those broken-slide victims <{POST_SNAPBACK}> I meant RS equivalent. I think it should be noted that TM sears never failed on me, nothing ever fell out from the inside. My WA's on the other hand, only the older ones were able to attest to such a claim. The paint may rub off, there may be seam lines, but at least nothing ever broke. Think about it, when was the last time some metal part broke on the P226, HiCapa, TM1911, or the Glock 17? If you bet money on whether I used Red in stock WAs, you'd be out of a lot of money. Speaking of seam lines, shall I post up a pic of a single sided WA safety from a SCW2 1911? There's a pretty big seam running across the flatside. EDIT: Despite what you may think, I actually love my WA's to bits. Wouldn't trade them for ANY TMs. BUT, a WA 6" Xcellerator Hybrid had less than perfectly casted frames and hybrid barrels. They were pitted in places and some of the edges were malformed. I don't think newer WA's are like that, but I haven't seen that in even WE's. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Newer SVIs are still like that. Edited August 24, 2007 by r.ocelot Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Chris North Posted August 24, 2007 Report Share Posted August 24, 2007 There's a metal kit to make a Hardballer out at RW now, but if I understand correctly it's not for the WA Hardballer. Maybe I'm missing something, but isn't that a little stupid? http://www.redwolfairsoft.com/redwolf/airs...il?prodID=23149 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
hitmanNo2 Posted August 24, 2007 Report Share Posted August 24, 2007 What makes you think that? It says it's for WA at the top. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Mathub Posted August 24, 2007 Report Share Posted August 24, 2007 Well, RW is known for weird products description. Quite tempting, I'll have to get rid of my hybrid 6 inch svi and get this. Yummy ! Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Chris North Posted August 24, 2007 Report Share Posted August 24, 2007 What makes you think that? It says it's for WA at the top. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> The description says its for an SCW2, and the WA Hardballer is an SCW3. I don't know what the difference is... Quote Link to post Share on other sites
AliceHKfan Posted August 25, 2007 Report Share Posted August 25, 2007 I'm mildly confused You have to by the SCW3 Hardballer alone to get the right sights Quote Link to post Share on other sites
snowman Posted August 25, 2007 Report Share Posted August 25, 2007 (edited) Generally agree with snowman, but I'd like to throw my increasing weight around my citing my own experience. ... BUT, a WA 6" Xcellerator Hybrid had less than perfectly casted frames and hybrid barrels. They were pitted in places and some of the edges were malformed. I don't think newer WA's are like that, but I haven't seen that in even WE's. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Funnily enough I had an Xcellerator Hybrid for a while and I agree with you on the quality of casting (notably pitting) - They DID seem to have a wobble around then. That said, the later SVIs I saw were back up to top notch. Cheers. PS I have to admit though, the two SVIs I still own are Magnas. Edited August 25, 2007 by snowman Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Mobius Strip Posted August 30, 2007 Report Share Posted August 30, 2007 Back to AMT's.....metal Longslide anyone? More detail here: http://www.arniesairsoft.co.uk/forums/inde...dpost&p=1487169 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
wotzat Posted January 18, 2010 Report Share Posted January 18, 2010 My apology for digging this one out, but, if you want extra mag. What is the ref for it ? Does a simple stack WA mag fit the AMT hardballer ? Has anyone purchased extra mags, and if so, what was the ref ? Thank you for your help on that precise matter. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
hitmanNo2 Posted January 18, 2010 Report Share Posted January 18, 2010 Any WA single stack mag will fit it. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
wotzat Posted January 18, 2010 Report Share Posted January 18, 2010 So a simple WA colt 1911a1 will fit ? This is such a good news ! Thank you HitmanNo2 ! Much appreciated ! Quote Link to post Share on other sites
hitmanNo2 Posted January 18, 2010 Report Share Posted January 18, 2010 Yep. The chances are you will never come across a WA single stacker that wont fit unless you get obscure stuff from the Yahoo Japan auctions. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.