BiKeReX Posted April 29, 2008 Report Share Posted April 29, 2008 Nice eotechs eel one! I really like the GG&G accessories! I have a GG&G eotech mount like that for sale if anyone is interested. cheers Quote Link to post Share on other sites
BoE.Solidius Posted April 29, 2008 Report Share Posted April 29, 2008 How much are the Chinese clones? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
eel one [COE] Posted April 29, 2008 Report Share Posted April 29, 2008 Nice eotechs eel one! I really like the GG&G accessories! I have a GG&G eotech mount like that for sale if anyone is interested. cheers Well you got to pimp your sight the ways that are possible. And for original sights, only original accessories will do the job. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
The Crunchy Bunny Posted April 29, 2008 Report Share Posted April 29, 2008 How much are the Chinese clones? $50-120 usually. It all depends on the model, shop, etc. BTW, Is this ACM 552 one of the newer improved ones? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Chaozx15 Posted April 30, 2008 Report Share Posted April 30, 2008 $50-120 usually. It all depends on the model, shop, etc. BTW, Is this ACM 552 one of the newer improved ones? im not to sure bout that but i got my Eotech 552 from here today: http://www.dragonredairsoft.com/airsoft/vi...productID=23133 absolutely no ghosting works perfectly and windage and elevation adjustments works completely! Quote Link to post Share on other sites
0nslaught Posted April 30, 2008 Report Share Posted April 30, 2008 im not to sure bout that but i got my Eotech 552 from here today: http://www.dragonredairsoft.com/airsoft/vi...productID=23133 absolutely no ghosting works perfectly and windage and elevation adjustments works completely! does it have the trademarks too? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
DUSTER:recon Posted April 30, 2008 Report Share Posted April 30, 2008 wish i could afford a real eotech. instead i settled for the king arms version... Quote Link to post Share on other sites
davedawg123 Posted April 30, 2008 Report Share Posted April 30, 2008 Old school bushnells/eotechs on phasor rifles FTW. http://www.phasers.net/2370/nr3c06.jpg http://www.phasers.net/2370/nr3c02.jpg Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Edmiles Posted April 30, 2008 Report Share Posted April 30, 2008 im not to sure bout that but i got my Eotech 552 from here today: http://www.dragonredairsoft.com/airsoft/vi...productID=23133 absolutely no ghosting works perfectly and windage and elevation adjustments works completely! Good to hear because mine is estimated to arrive tomorrow And yes 0nslaught, they have full trades Quote Link to post Share on other sites
kliskey Posted April 30, 2008 Report Share Posted April 30, 2008 Hopefully my real steel eotech review will be up tomorrow, if anyone is interested Also, for those that are after an RS Eotech 552, I have one for sale, so please check the thread below or PM me! Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Chaozx15 Posted May 1, 2008 Report Share Posted May 1, 2008 does it have the trademarks too? yup comes with full trademarks...they are not accurate Eotech trademarks though, but it looks cool nonetheless Quote Link to post Share on other sites
0nslaught Posted May 1, 2008 Report Share Posted May 1, 2008 yup comes with full trademarks...they are not accurate Eotech trademarks though, but it looks cool nonetheless aw what how are they wrong?? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Chaozx15 Posted May 1, 2008 Report Share Posted May 1, 2008 aw what how are they wrong?? upon further inspection i noticed the trademarks are not incorrect, at first i thought they were because based on the RS one i used to have i noticed that it did not have "L3 EOtech" trademark on the battery casing like this replica one just the lil square and "EOtech", but my was the older version since the revision ones do sport the "L3 Eotech" Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Edmiles Posted May 1, 2008 Report Share Posted May 1, 2008 upon further inspection i noticed the trademarks are not incorrect, at first i thought they were because based on the RS one i used to have i noticed that it did not have "L3 EOtech" trademark on the battery casing like this replica one just the lil square and "EOtech", but my was the older version since the revision ones do sport the "L3 Eotech" Also 'Eotech' on the replica is in a sort of gold, while on the RS it's a sort of silver Quote Link to post Share on other sites
tom lawson Posted May 1, 2008 Report Share Posted May 1, 2008 Also 'Eotech' on the replica is in a sort of gold, while on the RS it's a sort of silver Hey Ed how is your EOTech? I've got one in the post, should i eagerly await its arrival? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Edmiles Posted May 1, 2008 Report Share Posted May 1, 2008 Hey Ed how is your EOTech? I've got one in the post, should i eagerly await its arrival? Oh sorry I was just making that observation from the pics Mine should come around tomorrowish... But! This chap seems to be very happy, I just hope they are all like that. im not to sure bout that but i got my Eotech 552 from here today: http://www.dragonredairsoft.com/airsoft/vi...productID=23133 absolutely no ghosting works perfectly and windage and elevation adjustments works completely! Quote Link to post Share on other sites
tom lawson Posted May 1, 2008 Report Share Posted May 1, 2008 Oh sorry I was just making that observation from the pics Mine should come around tomorrowish... Ah ok, no worries! Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Chaozx15 Posted May 1, 2008 Report Share Posted May 1, 2008 (edited) Here is a few pictures of my mounted on my ICS m4...my A&K m249 para that my girlfriend got for me comes in next monday cant wait to mount this on it Edited May 1, 2008 by Chaozx15 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
0nslaught Posted May 2, 2008 Report Share Posted May 2, 2008 oooh! i like! too bad they didnt put the tiny F on the very bottom right corner. plus the wind adjustment holes should be both circles, not just one circle and the other being a circle/circulary triangle thingy. but other than that, looks pretty nice. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Edmiles Posted May 2, 2008 Report Share Posted May 2, 2008 Yeah that looks nice! Can't wait for mine, still hasn't turned up bleh. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
DesertFoxRomel Posted May 6, 2008 Report Share Posted May 6, 2008 For those of you who owned/ used a real and clone eotech, how much better is the real one compared to the clones? How much of a difference in performance and target acquisition does it make? I would love a real eotech, but the price is way over my budget, and I am considering a clone if it performs at least 80-90 % as good as the real one. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Connery Posted May 6, 2008 Report Share Posted May 6, 2008 It's been covered, but the main difference is seeing the reticle itself. I can't really describe it, it's something that you need to see for yourself, but if I were to try, then the real one is much more crisp and clear than the fakie. Plus, the fake one reflects off itself. A lot. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
blarock86 Posted May 12, 2008 Report Share Posted May 12, 2008 My same eotech mounted on an ACM M500 shotgun: (first tried with a miniscule red-dot, but that sucks if you are used to an eotech) Quote Link to post Share on other sites
tweaked_tim Posted May 13, 2008 Report Share Posted May 13, 2008 Any pics on the a&k M249 yet? I have an echo 1 and star on the way and might need to get some optics. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
chas Posted May 13, 2008 Report Share Posted May 13, 2008 (edited) Here's what Im after (waiting to order the Eotech): And this one just because there arent many Eoteched M249s around. Actually I think the Eotech might be perfect for support weapons: light, great field of view, fast target acquisition and Eotechjust started delivering their new support weapon version sights. The reticle on these models is a variation of the claasic ones: additional to the center reticle, they have a row of 3 extra dots, each of wich is set fordifferent distances, so theres no need for the gunner to calculate elevation adjustment. Edited May 13, 2008 by chas Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.